You're 100% correct :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Masfer
Thanks for the spelling tip :D It's heroes. :D
Printable View
You're 100% correct :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Masfer
Thanks for the spelling tip :D It's heroes. :D
But he's not right if he thinks I am no hero means there are no heroes, is he?Quote:
Originally Posted by Casiopea
:o
Within the given context, it's OK:Quote:
Originally Posted by RonBee
In this particular situation there are no heroes. Heroes were not considered at all.
Ellipsis: "I am no hero means, there are no heroes (who exist in this situation)."
:D
My interpretation:
[/list:u:94ea39ddc5]
- I am no hero means:
[list:94ea39ddc5]"Too much attention is being focused on me. I am not the hero in this situation."
That is the way I interpret the statement in the context in which it was said.
:)
I agree, adding "no heroes in this situation" means, heroes do not exist (in that given situation). To say, however, "I am not the hero in this situation" is different. It implies that there is a hero. It's just not me.Quote:
Originally Posted by RonBee
:D You're my hero RonBee. :D
That's what I meant. That's exactly what I meant. And that is what I believe Jessica meant.Quote:
Originally Posted by Casiopea
Aw, shucks. :oops:Quote:
Originally Posted by Casiopea