|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Here are some examples which made me confused : 1. The British Prime Minister lives /IN/ 10 Downing Street. --> Should I rather say "AT" ? If so, please tell me why. 2. Sherlock Holmes lived somewhere ON Baker Street. ---> Why is there ON and not IN ? Isn't it like "I live IN Green Street" ? Please, give me some rules, best wishes, ps. what's an equivalency certificate ? |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Hope that helps. Note, equivalency means, equal in value. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| hmm... I'm not sure if I get the idea... do you mean that we can say "in Green Steet" and "on Green Street" as well ? no difference between them at all ??? |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| oops, my question got lost among other topics... |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| When Bush traveled to India recently, he stopped in Kabul for a few hours. Later I heard in the news 'Bush stopped over at Afghanistan." If all of the following are not correct, which of the following is/are correct: 1. Bush stopped in Kabul. 2. Bush stopped at Kabul. 3. Bush stopped in Afghanistan. 4. Bush stopped at Afghanistan. Thanks |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Casiopea, could you explain once again the whole thing ? I'm not sure if I understand your last entry. Best wishes, |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| forum-mail, North American speakers use "on" + the street's name, whereas British speakers use "in" + the street's name. Both are English; both are acceptable. Englishstudent, "at" expresses a point in time or space; temporally, e.g., Let's meet at 5:00; locationally, e.g., "We stopped at the store to by some milk." As for the following uses of "at", below, this is the first time I've seen "at" used with a country name: 2. Bush stopped at Kabul. 4. Bush stopped at Afghanistan. One'd expect to see a specific location, say, "at Kabul airport". Possibly, 2. and 4. represent a dialect variation, one I'm not familiar with, wherein the country itself is viewed as a specific location in the world; i.e., "Bush stopped at such and such locational points on his (travel) agenda. Hope that helps. |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
My house is on/in green street. I live at a house in/on green street. The PM lives at 10 Downing Street In this case 10 Downing street is a government department. The PM lives in an apartment at 10 Downing street Sherlock Holmes lived in a house somewhere on baker street As for rules, well I'm sure someone more erudite than myself will explain As for equivalency certificate - your guess is as good as mine - try a google |
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
| This is kinda interesting...I`d like to flog it a bit more. I live ON Elm street. I live AT 100 Elm street. I walked INTO the middle of Elm street. I am standing ON Elm street. Or, I am standing IN the middle of Elm street. Saying I live "in" Elm street sounds very strange to me; I`d say I live "on" a particular street. I don`t feel the difference between using "in" or "on" is as big a deal as how "at" is used. If you said "I live at Elm street", I`d be waiting for you to tell me the street number. That sentence standing alone sounds plain silly to me. |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| prepositions |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| puzzling use of prepositions | zaffar | Ask a Teacher | 1 | 28-Jul-2005 12:37 |
| Prepositions | bunnyhita | Ask a Teacher | 6 | 08-Jul-2005 11:46 |
| 7th grade GATE LA prepositions presentation | Ravenclaw | Ask a Teacher | 9 | 09-Jun-2005 00:24 |
| Confusion with Prepositions | daw_al_qamar | Ask a Teacher | 4 | 13-May-2005 16:30 |