Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Lenka is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    863

    Default past simple, used to, would

    Which of the verb forms can complete the sentences below? Tick all possible answers.


    In the old days people _______ you if you were in trouble.
    a) helped b) used to help c) would help

    (The solution says a,b,c are the right answers - but why? I don' understand it.... I thought that just answer a) was right...)

    it is a conditional, isn't it? So how can I use "used to" or "would" ?

  2. #2
    Casiopea's Avatar
    Casiopea is offline VIP Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    12,971

    Default Re: past simple, used to, would

    "used" is a past tense form; e.g, used to, something I did in the past but no longer do (as much) today.

    "would" expresses more than one meaning, one of which is, a past routine or habit; e.g., She would wait for the bus every evening.

    Hope that helps.

  3. #3
    Lenka is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    863
    Threadstarter / Original Poster

    Default Re: past simple, used to, would

    Yes, I can understand this well... I know what "used to" and "would" means, but if we say:

    If you were in trouble, people would help you. - this means they would help you (nowadays) - it's present, isn't it?

    But if we wnat to say the same sentence, but in the past it's just the same sentence? I don't have to change the tense? For example something like: If you were in trouble yesterday, they would have helped you.

    On the other hand, as I got to write this, I slowly got to know what the problem was. I think I (probably) understand why the tense isn't changed. The reason is the fact that the "would" in the sentence doesn't mean (he would do it if something happened), but "used to". Am I right?

  4. #4
    rewboss's Avatar
    rewboss is offline Key Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,554
    Teacher

    Default Re: past simple, used to, would

    Part of the problem with "would" is that it has so many different jobs, it's hard to keep track of them all. In this case, it's actually the past tense of "will", and indicates that it was a matter of routine.

    Very often we have to rely on context. The sentence beings "In the old days...", and this implies that we're not talking about something that didn't really happen, but that we're describing what people routinely did.

    Sometimes, writers and speakers give the grammar a bit of extra help by adding the word "always": "...people would always help you..." It's not necessary, but it makes the meaning a bit clearer.

  5. #5
    Lenka is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    863
    Threadstarter / Original Poster

    Default Re: past simple, used to, would

    OK, thanks a lot for your explanations... I belive it's the best to go to an English speaking country to learn it "without learning", but... money, money, money... you know.
    I'll perhaps learn how to use would and all these other words in time...

Similar Threads

  1. Is Yesterday a past time?
    By shun in forum General Language Discussions
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 13-Feb-2008, 17:54
  2. Past Continuous and Past Simple
    By Cátia in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 16-Feb-2006, 04:38
  3. Simple past without defined time reference in AE
    By Jens in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-Jun-2005, 21:04
  4. present, simple past, past participle questions
    By oswaldo in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 20-Apr-2005, 05:11
  5. Past Simple Time Reference
    By Moreen in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-Nov-2004, 08:23

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0