I have a question about this specific sentence:
She is like a mother, a sweetheart, and an ally in battle.
I was wondering which way was the correct way to read this sentence. Is this a list of three things she is like: She is LIKE a mother, she is LIKE a sweetheart, and she is LIKE an ally in battle.
...or would one read this sentence as: She is LIKE a mother, she IS a sweetheart, and she IS an ally in battle?
Does the word "like" distribute throughout to each of the words after the commas?
It is the former - "like" distributes to each element. It would be better though to write it as "She is like a mother, sweetheart, and ally in battle."
Actually, I think the variation with the indefinite articles has a much more pleasing rhythm to it. It would be very appropriate in literary English, which is where I suspect it came from.
Thanks for replying, Coffa and rewboss.![]()
She is like a mother, a sweetheart, and an ally in battle.
She is like a mother, sweetheart, and ally in battle.
So, either one would be correct then?
I guess my main concern was whether "like" would distribute to each element when reading the sentence, and I think Coffa already answered that for me. Thanks a bunch!
Omitting the article/determiner sounds odd (to me) - but that's just me.![]()
Additionally, 'sweatheart', if spoken sounds like an appositive.Here's a fellow talkin' about his senior colleague to his wife:
She is like a mother, Sweetheart, and ally in battle.
^What's an 'appositive', Casiopea? Do you mean it sounds like the fellow is telling his wife that his senior colleague is his lover?
Would it sound better if I leave the article/determiner on then?
It's personal preference, I think. I can't really agree with Casiopea on this - I think she means a vocative, not an appositive (ie addressing your 'Sweetheart'), and the tonal inflection would make it very clear if a vocative was intended. An appositive meaning would be indicated by a sentence like "She was like a mother, nurturer to my children, and ally in battle." That is, the appositive clause modifies 'mother'.
Right. Vocative, not appositive. Thanks Coffa.
Angelic, leaving the article out sounds rather ungrammatical to me. (I speak a North American dialect of English.)![]()