I have two sentences:
He locked the door.
He went out for dinner.
Which tense we should use to connect them?
He locked the door and went out for dinner
Or: He had locked the door before going out for dinner.
Tell me which one is better? and the meaning of each one?
Tks
Neither one is necessarily better, but we would normally use simple past there. There is, absent context, no reason to use past perfect there.
:)
"Neither one is necessarily better." I haven't caught your idea
I will put my sentence in a situation like that: My house has been stolen and I want to insist to everybody that I locked the door before going out. Whether I should use the past perfect tense?
" I had locked the door before going out for dinner"
:)
Oh, by the way, what is an absent context?
How about this.
He locked the door before (he) went out for dinner.
Sounds more natural.
Hi,Originally Posted by moonlite
As I know, "before" is a prep and be followed by a noun or a gerund. So I don't think we should omit the subject (He). How about you?
I am no teacher. But what you say sounds ok to me. However, in general conversations, that sentence is often heard.
I agree with Solace- it should be 'before going' or 'before he went'.![]()
If I say "Neither one is necessarily better" then I mean that there is no reason to believe that one is better than the other.Originally Posted by solace
In your example I would use the simple past. It is not necessary to use the past perfect. (I assume that you meant that your house had been burgled.)
Context is the surrounding sentences--the sentences that come before and after a sentence.
:)
Now, I do understand. Thanks :)
Another question: Which cases should we use past perfect tense?
Hi,Originally Posted by moonlite
If you say so, everybody can understand you. However I think it is not a standard English.
Anyway, such utterance will be accepted in verbal communication:)