|
#1
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| It depends very much on the sttitude of the person who is making the judgment. Strict grammarians would define good English as meeting their standards, while others would say that successful communication is good English. There's also the aspect of beauty of language, especially in literature. |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Don't we teachers know the answer to this question? Good English is what your teacher expects you to speak and write. I never miss an opportunity to tell students what rule number one is in academia. Give the teacher what he wants. |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| Good English depends on your point of view, and that depends a lot on culture. And it can change over time as well. What is good English in one situation may not be good English in another situation. I was working through a text with some students the other day; it was full of phrases like "this requires the use of overly large consoles", which I said means the same as "you need consoles which are too big". "Ah yes," said one student, "I can tell that the English in the text is better than what you just said." I pointed out that while it might be good formal English, you wouldn't ever speak like that in the pub. Both sentences are good English in their correct domains, but the first one would be bad English in casual conversation, and the second would be bad English in a technical report. |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| Any other teachers here who, when stuck for an answer to the question "why", fall back on my reply "Because I say so"? Luckily my adult students are sensitive enough not to throw anything at me which can cause permanent damage. But seriously, how can anyone explain the 12 (+) pronunciations of "ugh" at the end of words - at least without your students losing the will to live? |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| I tell my students the reason English, or any other language, was developed was to help us transmit a thought from our mind into someone else's mind. If our choice of words accurately achieves this task, as well as - or better than - any other combination, then we are obviously speaking (or writing) correct English. Some grammarians fantasize that they are laying down rules for the language, whereas in reality they are merely attempting, and often failing, to accurately describe its behaviour. |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
| In my country,people speak 'Singlish' mostly.They mix up with some Chinese,Malay and Indian words together to speak it.They always end sentences with 'lah'.Based on this spoken language,I think it is totally a broken English.As for me,a good English shouldn't be mixed up with any other languages. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Thanks people. For me, a proper English would be a good English, that says, prescriptive grammar should be used. It is understood that, messages can be sent across using a descriptive grammar, and yet the listeners can understand. This, I would call it a successful communication, whether or not prescriptive or descriptive is used. Sadly, I'm at a dead end, and my essay is due in another two days. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| good, english |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help | zhangjin | Ask a Teacher | 22 | 29-Mar-2008 19:47 |
| Seminar | mallikatweety | Ask a Teacher | 5 | 30-Jun-2006 11:07 |
| Is it right? | Genrikh | Ask a Teacher | 2 | 03-Dec-2005 15:59 |
| how good is my english? | Anonymous | Ask a Teacher | 2 | 10-May-2004 21:48 |