
04-Oct-2006, 23:35
|
 | Key Member | | Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,554
Member Type: English Teacher | |
Re: modal verbs vs. modal auxiliaries In short, modal verbs are also auxiliary verbs. Modal verbs describe possibility, permission or obligation, while auxiliary verbs (and this is not the standard description, but in English it generally holds true) can be made negative by adding "not". Verbs like "can", "must", "will" all describe possibility or obligation (and are thus modal), and we can also have "can't", "mustn't" and "won't" (i.e. "will not"), so they're also auxiliary verbs.
To add to the complication, these verbs are sometimes called "defective", because they are missing the infinitive, present participle and past participle forms. You can have almost any variation on these three designations -- defective modal verbs, defective modal auxiliaries... take your pick.
In the end, these are just labels applied to grammatical constructs, and you won't look foolish if you use "the wrong one", for the simple reason that there isn't such a thing as "the wrong one" in this case. |