|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Only poor women who couldn't afford servants didn't use to have to wear corsets" is considered incorrect, while the version with would "Only poor women who couldn't afford servants wouldn't have to wear corsets" is not, as I have to explain the difference to a first certificate class, and I really canŽt see it. Thanks |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Note: this is not current usage. Informally, it's quite common to say 'didn't use to' (with the /s/ sound). But, for me, the negative is "used not to". I'd think your second version a bit dubious as well, but maybe that's just a personal preference - my ear is a bit disorientated by all those negatives. b |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Yeah, I know it sounds funny, but the reason it's considered incorrect is not because " did not use to" is normally so, as this is quoted as the correct negative elsewhere. I think it has something to do with the relation to "have to", but I could be wrong. In the full version of the exercise there are three possible forms to complete the sentence and the student has to cross out the incorrect one: "Only poor women who couldn't afford servant's didn't use to have to/wouldn't have to/didn't have to wear corsets." I have the answer key at the back and the incorrect option seems to be the first one. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| didnt, use, towouldnt |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |