Forum newsfeeds 
|  | | Notices | You are welcome to answer questions posted in the Ask a Teacher forum as long as your suggestions, help, and advice reflect a good understanding of the English language. If you are not a teacher, you will need to state that clearly at the top of your post. Please note, all posts are moderated by our in-house language experts, so make sure your suggestions, help, and advice house the kind of information an international language teacher would offer. If not, and your posts do not contribute to the topic in a positive way, they will be subject to deletion. | 
29-Oct-2006, 00:08
|  | VIP Member | | Join Date: Nov 2002 Country: USA
Posts: 6,095
Current Location: New York First Language: American English Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
| |  Re: Would, Should, Could, Have, Had, Has
Quote:
Originally Posted by riverkid  Last year he can't have run three miles. He's been a quadriplegic for two years.
Now we have, according to you, a present tense verb describing a past tense situation. | Yes. But a better version would be "Last, year he couldn't have run three miles." That would have a past tense verb describing a past time. |
29-Oct-2006, 00:10
| | VIP Member | | Join Date: Nov 2002 Country: USA
Posts: 6,095
Current Location: New York First Language: American English Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
| | Re: Would, Should, Could, Have, Had, Has
Quote:
Originally Posted by riverkid You might not be confused but you are confusing semantic versus syntactic. Is it then deliberate? | I'm not confusing anything. Past tense is past tense. I'm sorry that you have a problem with that.  |
29-Oct-2006, 01:01
| | Key Member | | Join Date: Aug 2006 Country: Canada
Posts: 3,025
Current Location: Canada First Language: English Thanks: 4
Thanked 474 Times in 437 Posts
| | Re: Would, Should, Could, Have, Had, Has
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeNewYork Yes. But a better version would be "Last, year he couldn't have run three miles." That would have a past tense verb describing a past time. | One collocation isn't better than another, Mike. We use language to express meaning and the meaning expressed by "can't have + PP", which denotes a past time event is a better version when we want to express something with greater emotion.
'can' can do this because of its modal meaning expresses a greater reality than "couldn't have + PP". Modal 'could' expresses greater uncertainty so it isn't as good a choice when we want to be nmore strident/ more assertive/ more {__}.
Below we see that it is very common to use the purported present tense modals in modal perfect which describes a past time event.
Results 1 - 10 of about 891,000 English pages for "will have already".
Results 1 - 10 of about 71,200 English pages for "shall have already".
Results 1 - 10 of about 3,330,000 English pages for "may have already".
The language just doesn't support your opinions, Mike. Nor does language science. But you keep crankin' 'em out.
Results 1 - 10 of about 56 English pages for "can have eaten".
Plug in some more with specific verbs, here I've used 'eaten' and you'll see that modals operate in all time sequences; that's how tenseless verbs work. |
29-Oct-2006, 01:08
| | VIP Member | | Join Date: Nov 2002 Country: USA
Posts: 6,095
Current Location: New York First Language: American English Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
| | Re: Would, Should, Could, Have, Had, Has
Quote:
Originally Posted by riverkid One collocation isn't better than another, Mike. We use language to express meaning and the meaning expressed by "can't have + PP", which denotes a past time event is a better version when we want to express something with greater emotion.
'can' can do this because of its modal meaning expresses a greater reality than "couldn't have + PP". Modal 'could' expresses greater uncertainty so it isn't as good a choice when we want to be nmore strident/ more assertive/ more {__}.
Below we see that it is very common to use the purported present tense modals in modal perfect which describes a past time event.
Results 1 - 10 of about 891,000 English pages for "will have already".
Results 1 - 10 of about 71,200 English pages for "shall have already".
Results 1 - 10 of about 3,330,000 English pages for "may have already".
The language just doesn't support your opinions, Mike. Nor does language science. But you keep crankin' 'em out.
Results 1 - 10 of about 56 English pages for "can have eaten".
Plug in some more with specific verbs, here I've used 'eaten' and you'll see that modals operate in all time sequences; that's how tenseless verbs work. | Pass.  |
29-Oct-2006, 01:15
| | Key Member | | Join Date: Aug 2006 Country: Canada
Posts: 3,025
Current Location: Canada First Language: English Thanks: 4
Thanked 474 Times in 437 Posts
| | Re: Would, Should, Could, Have, Had, Has
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeNewYork I'm not confusing anything. Past tense is past tense. I'm sorry that you have a problem with that. | Stamping your feet and repeating the same thing over and over doesn't qualify as proof, Mike.
===============
The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher's Book
In English, modals are derived from verbs that did carry tense and take agreement markers during a much earlier stage of the language.
In fact, phrasal forms developed in part because the original class of modals lost their connection to time, and the phrasal forms gave English users a way to mark tense and express modality on one and the same verb form.
============= |
29-Oct-2006, 01:29
| | VIP Member | | Join Date: Nov 2002 Country: USA
Posts: 6,095
Current Location: New York First Language: American English Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
| | Re: Would, Should, Could, Have, Had, Has
Quote:
Originally Posted by riverkid Stamping your feet and repeating the same thing over and over doesn't qualify as proof, Mike.
===============
The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher's Book
In English, modals are derived from verbs that did carry tense and take agreement markers during a much earlier stage of the language.
In fact, phrasal forms developed in part because the original class of modals lost their connection to time, and the phrasal forms gave English users a way to mark tense and express modality on one and the same verb form.
============= | <<<Stamping your feet and repeating the same thing over and over doesn't qualify as proof, Mike.>>>
Advice that you would do well by taking. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT. The time now is 21:25. | |
