|
#1
| |||
| |||
| What does the use of takes imply in this sentence? Thanks! |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
What would you use instead of takes there? (I have often seen doubt used here instead of question, but a doubt is not a question.) |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Thank you for your help Ronbee !!!! |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Will take? The journey has not happened yet, after all. I think it's a tough question. My opinion is that it depends upon whether the clause is independent or not 1. "I can't wait to see <independent object clause>. 2. "I can't wait to see where/what/who <dependent object clause> Compare Old English: a) I know not if fortune shall make me a beggar or a prince. b) I know not where I'm bound. In 1), nothing after the primary clause is related to the object clause, so it must stand alone, and takes its tense accordingly: "where this journey WILL take me..." In 2), the object clause is dependent on the primary clause, and takes its tense from that clause. |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| But a doubt can lead to a question |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Hi, Still I can’t understand why will take me is impossible. I can only humbly put up with it – OK, they say so in Britain, learn it, no questions asked. |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| I can't agree with you more, sometimes it's a little bit complicated to raise so many questions to study the structures. Language itself is something mysterious. IMHO: speak English as what the native speakers do and mistake like what they make(As few as possible) ohhh |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| |
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
| Your sentence is fine with either "takes me" or "will take me". |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
| Yep. "Will" here is perfectly acceptable. "Will" indicates a prediction. On the other hand, the simple present tense, when referring to a future event, indicates that the future event is certain, but that no special planning on the part of either the speaker or the subject was necessary. Both are possible here, but "will" allows for the possibility that the end of the journey may not actually be reached. English doesn't have a proper future tense; instead, it uses a system of modal verbs and aspects in the present tense: simple present -- the event is definite, and neither the speaker nor the subject have made any special arrangements to make it happen: The train arrives at 2.30 tomorrow; The shops are closed next Wednesday. present progressive -- the event is definite, all the arrangements have been made: We are flying to Corfu next summer. going to -- the decision has been made, but so far no arrangements have been made, or special arrangements are unnecessary: I am going to phone her tomorrow. This construction can also be used for events that are about to happen very, very soon: He's standing too close to the edge -- he's going to fall. will/may/might -- The speaker is making a prediction. "Will" means the speaker is certain, "may" or "might" means there is some doubt: It will rain tomorrow (I am sure of it); I may buy a new car tomorrow (but I may not). will -- The speaker is making a decision at the moment of speaking: I've just remembered -- it's Harry's birthday today! I'll phone him. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| doubt, tense |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| present perfect tense & present perfect continuous tense | *zaizai~love* | Ask a Teacher | 5 | 30-Oct-2008 22:06 |
| How would you define the future time? | shun | Linguistics | 143 | 13-Oct-2006 01:20 |
| about present continuos tense and simple present tense | Anonymous | Ask a Teacher | 2 | 24-Sep-2006 19:07 |
| Do we have future tense? | shun | Teaching English | 1 | 07-Oct-2003 17:06 |