|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I just would like to know if the following sentence is correct "People should worry for themselves and not for other people" Thanks |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Yup, it's fine, Silvia. |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Say: People should worry about themselves and not about other people. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
"People should worry for themselves and not for other people" You may well be right about Silvia's intent, Ron, but the two sentences have different meanings. |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| Admittedly, I haven't done much research into it, but in the few instances of "worry for" that I have seen "worry" is a noun and not a verb. Wired News: Source of Worry for MicrosoftI did find one instance of "worry for" in which "worry" is used as a noun, thus: Q&A: Benazir Bhutto on Pakistan's Future - Newsweek: World News - MSNBC.com~R |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Google has a number of examples of 'worry for themselves' Results 1 - 10 of about 93 English pages for "worry for themselves" But again, the meaning is different. "Don't worry for me" allows us to say "Allow me to do my own worrying about my own problems". Changing it to 'about' doesn't allow us that potential meaning. I think that you'd agree that a greater volume of use for one collocation over another doesn't preclude the availablilty of the less common one. |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
~R |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| sentence, right |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Are the 5 basic sentence patterns sacred? | infinikyte | General Language Discussions | 49 | 28-Aug-2009 21:52 |
| Dear MikeNewYork... sentence fragment | wendy | Ask a Teacher | 10 | 09-Mar-2009 09:50 |
| such a sentence | therose | Ask a Teacher | 1 | 21-Mar-2006 13:27 |
| Attributive Clause - China Needs Your Help | ChinaDavid | Ask a Teacher | 5 | 09-Jan-2005 15:56 |
| grammar | jiang | Ask a Teacher | 8 | 17-Dec-2003 19:02 |