Dear Teachers
How is tense defined? If there is no future tense in english then give me the reasons in detail and obviously with examples please.
Khursheed Ahmad Khan
Printable View
Dear Teachers
How is tense defined? If there is no future tense in english then give me the reasons in detail and obviously with examples please.
Khursheed Ahmad Khan
The tense of a verb is a form that (usually) defines whether you are describing an action of the past, the present or the future.
The reason English does not "have" a future tense is that there is no future form of the verb itself that would describe the future (as it is in, e.g. French: I will go>>J'irai)
In English, in order to give information regarding the future, we mostly use the modal will, but not always.
Consider:
I will go the market tomorrow
I'm going to the market tomorrow
The market opens at 9:00
I'm going to open the box (i.e. I will open the box)
All of the above examples describe the future.
This is a matter of definition. Some say that English has no future tense because English doesn't have an inflected verb form for future. Others say the inflection is a minor matter and the English creates a future tense with "will" or "shall" instead of inflection. IMO, English has a future tense.Quote:
Originally Posted by khush
For me, a tense is construction that is related to time. In English, each of the tenses can be used for a time other than that indicated by its name.
We can, for example, indicate future time with the future tense or the present tense:
The train is leaving very soon.
The train will leave very soon.
The train leaves very soon.
Language teachers use "tense" as MikeNewYork does here. Linguists use the term in a narrow sense.
For example:
I have seen this film before.
A teacher would say that "have seen" is the present perfect tense. A linguist would say that it is the perfect aspect of the present tense.
I prefer not to talk about the "future tense" in English. Linguistically there is no such thing, but also we tend to use present tenses to talk about the future.
Here's an example of a dialogue (from a real-life TV show):
Sarah: What are you doing?
Doctor: I'm making a jamming detector.
Sarah: What happens if whatever's doing the jamming jams the jamming detector?
Notice how "jams" is a present tense but actually refers to a possible future event. (A common mistake among non-native speakers is to use "will" here, because they are taught that "will" is the future tense.)
We have many different ways of referring to future events:
If it is an event that is 100% definite (often because it is a regular event) which does not require any special preparation, we use the simple present: "The train arrives at 6.34 tomorrow."
If it is part of a condition that must be met (i.e., an "if" or "when" clause), we use the simple present: "If it rains tomorrow..."
If we are making a prediction, we use a modal verb like "will" (if we are confident), or "may", "might", "could" or "should" (if we are not so confident): "It might rain tomorrow."
If, at the moment of speaking, we are making a decision, we use "will" or "shall": "What happens if the whatever's doing the jamming jams the jamming detector?" -- "Er... I shall build in a protective circuit."
If the decision has already been made, but preparations have not yet been made (or preparations are unnecessary), we use "going to": "I'm going to buy a new car." "I'm going to phone her tonight."
If the decision has already been made and all the preparations are complete, we use the present progressive: "I am flying to Corfu next week -- I have the tickets right here."
The last two uses are sometimes confusing, and very often we can use either. But sometimes there are differences:
"I'm going to take Jill out for a meal at her favourite restaurant." (Jill doesn't know about this yet.)
"I'm taking Jill out for a meal at her favourite restaurant." (I've already invited Jill, and she said "Yes".)
I know this is not my thread, but I have to thank Rewboss for clarifying some of the subtle differences between different tense forms in English, especially the difference between "going to" and present progressive.
The professor at my Linguistics class told us the same thing: there are only two tenses in English, and those are past and present. But why? modals have innate tenses and some of them have future tense in them, don't they? Sure, English has no verb inflection for future tense but does it really mean there's no future tense in English? is it an establish fact among linguists?
There are no facts here; there are only viewpoints.Quote:
Originally Posted by HaraKiriBlade
If English verbs used a -will suffix for future tense, all linguists would proclaim an English future tense. The mere fact that the word "will" is separate is simply a matter of construction.
English has no future tense. It has many many ways to discuss the future. 'will/shall' have long been mistakenly described as the future tense for English but these are verbs of mood not tense. Both can be used in past, present and future time situations.
In addition to Rewboss's offerings, here are a few more. Sorry if there are any repeats.
be [just] about to
want to
have to
need to
[all the modal verbs]
be supposed to
intend to
plan to
Quote:
Originally Posted by riverkid
And the presence of alternatives does nothing to change the future tense.
Clearly it does, Mike. It makes the traditional notion of a future tense nonsensical but typical of prescriptive grammar. Make up a rule and stick with it come hell or high water or overwhelmig proof that it's another bad 'rule'.Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeNewYork
I have yet to see any proof. As usual, I see nothing but opinion.Quote:
Originally Posted by riverkid
This will be just another subject about which we will not likely agree. :-D