#1  
Old 05-Dec-2006, 18:10
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2
Member Type: Student or Learner
Default could/would had accepted

hi,
i have 3 questions..

1)Once Tom had received Harriet’s letter in his hands he had an offer that he could accepted or rejected..is this correct or do i need to say he could had accepted or rejected

2) Can i say could had accepted? can i say i would had accepted it? i am a bit lost

3) what is the difference in the meaning beween it is in your hand and it is on your hands?
thanks for ur time
  #2  
Old 05-Dec-2006, 18:38
No Longer With Us
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,449
Member Type: Other
Default Re: could/would had accepted

I would rewrite it as a simpler sentence:

Once Tom had received Harriet's letter, he had an offer that he could either accept or reject.

It's not usual to add "in his hands" to "receive".

As to the difference between "It is in your hands" and "It is on your hands", it does depend on the context in which they are used. Both could be a simple physical description, or could be indicating resonsibility for action.
  #3  
Old 05-Dec-2006, 20:24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 671
Default Re: could/would had accepted

Quote:
Originally Posted by constantinos11 View Post
hi,
i have 3 questions..

1)Once Tom had received Harriet’s letter in his hands he had an offer that he could accepted or rejected..is this correct or do i need to say he could had accepted or rejected

2) Can i say could had accepted? can i say i would had accepted it? i am a bit lost

3) what is the difference in the meaning beween it is in your hand and it is on your hands?
thanks for ur time
'Could' is a modal auxiliary, and there are only four possible forms for a modal auxiliary in English:

1) Present simple - Modal + Infinitive - 'could accept'
2) Present continuous - Modal + be + present participle - 'could be accepting'
3) Perfect simple - Modal + have + past participle - 'could have accepted'
4) Perfect continuous - Modal + have been + present participle - 'could have been accepting'

So, your questions:

1) 'Had' is the perfect simple tense of 'to have', so you use the modal in the perfect simple form - "...that he could have accepted or rejected."

2) No, you can't. As above, 'could had' or 'would had' are not grammatical in English.

3) Something is 'in your hands' when you have possession of it. Something is 'on your hands' when it is a burden to you. For example:

"I do not want the responsibility of carrying out this order on my hands before I see the order in my hands."
  #4  
Old 06-Dec-2006, 00:43
Newbie
Threadstarter  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2
Member Type: Student or Learner
Default Re: could/would had accepted

thank u very much
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
couldwould, had, accepted


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Could/Would manplp Ask a Teacher 1 19-Apr-2006 11:07


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:27.



Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.