Quote:
Originally Posted by ssxia I would like to confirm the usage of the following two construction:
1. I saw him entering the house.
2. I saw him enter the house.
If I understand correctly, the first construction means "He was entering the house and I saw him". The second one means "He entered the house and I saw him".
By the same reasoning, the following sentences have these meanings:
3.Did Sam see him entering the house? (At the moment when he was entering the house, Sam saw the whole process of entering and I am questioning someone if that was true.)
4.Did Sam see him enter the house? (He entered the house before. Sam saw him did that, not necessarily the complete process and I am questioning someone if that was true.)
5.I didn’t hear you come in. (You came in and I did not hear you)
6.I didn’t hear you coming in. (You were coming in and I did not hear you) |
As TDOL said, any difference depends on the length of the event. With longer events, the meanings diverge:
I saw her playing a tennis match. [part of the process]
I saw her play a tennis match. [the entire thing]
I heard him proposing to her. [part of the conversation]
I heard him propose to her. [the entire conversation]