|
#1
| |||
| |||
| 1. I saw him entering the house. 2. I saw him enter the house. If I understand correctly, the first construction means "He was entering the house and I saw him". The second one means "He entered the house and I saw him". By the same reasoning, the following sentences have these meanings: 3.Did Sam see him entering the house? (At the moment when he was entering the house, Sam saw the whole process of entering and I am questioning someone if that was true.) 4.Did Sam see him enter the house? (He entered the house before. Sam saw him did that, not necessarily the complete process and I am questioning someone if that was true.) 5.I didn’t hear you come in. (You came in and I did not hear you) 6.I didn’t hear you coming in. (You were coming in and I did not hear you) |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Generally, the gerund is used when we catch part of the process and the bare infinitive we we catch it all. In your examples, it's a very short action, so there's little distinction between the two forms. |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
I saw her playing a tennis match. [part of the process] I saw her play a tennis match. [the entire thing] I heard him proposing to her. [part of the conversation] I heard him propose to her. [the entire conversation] |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| quotsee, doing, somethingquot |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |