#1  
Old 04-Mar-2004, 03:04
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default shift in tense

Is this correct?

*I knew that the group instructed us to bury bottles but I live in the city.

I still currently live in the city so I used "live" instead of "lived."

Is the shift in tense in the sentence *above allowable?

Is there ever a time when a shift in tense is allowable?

Thanks.
  #2  
Old 04-Mar-2004, 07:38
Casiopea's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,971
Member Type: Other
Default Re: shift in tense

...the group instructed us to bury the bottles (in the countryside), but, since I live in the city, I couldn't do it.

"I live in the city" expresses a general fact. (OK)

OR

... the group instructed us to bury the bottles (in the countryside), but, since I lived in the city at that time, I couldn't do it then.

"I lived in the city" expresses a past situation.

All the best,
  #3  
Old 04-Mar-2004, 13:40
davidw55555
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

THANKS, CASIOPEA. :)
  #4  
Old 04-Mar-2004, 13:54
davidw55555
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

By the way, I noticed this sentence in a book I am reading :

The Greek philosopher Hierocles warned Diocletian that Christianity is not "like the cult of Mithras."

Are these shifts in tense OK as well?
  #5  
Old 04-Mar-2004, 19:16
MikeNewYork's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,073
Member Type: Academic
Default Re: shift in tense

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is this correct?

*I knew that the group instructed us to bury bottles but I live in the city.

I still currently live in the city so I used "live" instead of "lived."

Is the shift in tense in the sentence *above allowable?

Is there ever a time when a shift in tense is allowable?

Thanks.
There is a bit of variation in the use of tenses in these situations. It may be true that you currently live in the city and it may be true that you lived in the city at that time. In this case, I would use the past tense. You are speaking of a past event and you lived in the city at that time. It only becomes really important if you no longer kive in the city. Then you would be forced to use the past tense.

It is natural for people to use the past tense when talking about events that happened in the past. As a matter of fact, there is a grammar "guideline" that subordinate clauses be in the past tense if the main clause is in the past tense. Exceptions to this include unchangeable characteristics and recognized truths.

One would usually say "When Columbus set sail in 1492, he knew that world is round -- not "was" because the eartyh has always been and still is "round". It gets tricky sometimes.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
shift, tense


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
about present continuos tense and simple present tense Anonymous Ask a Teacher 2 24-Sep-2006 19:07
present perfect tense Anonymous Ask a Teacher 5 15-Jul-2004 17:12
IF Anonymous Ask a Teacher 7 04-Mar-2004 00:49
Do we have future tense? shun Teaching English 1 07-Oct-2003 17:06


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:40.



Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.