The stress placed on a word or words always depends on context.
Question:
How can I link future to "love" rather than "paradise"?Perhaps:
In the future I will be in love.Or:
I look forward to a future of love in paradise.![]()
in phrases like these: future love paradise
silver knife handle
does stress depend on the context?
How can I link future to "love" rather than "paradise"?
Thank you
The stress placed on a word or words always depends on context.
Question:
How can I link future to "love" rather than "paradise"?Perhaps:
In the future I will be in love.Or:
I look forward to a future of love in paradise.![]()
Hi,
I think you misunderstood the question, Ron. Nello must have meant the logical stress. It's an issue that warrants for some attention, I even made a rule for my pupils three or four years ago because of their constant intonation mistakes.
Here it is, in a nutshell.
If a noun has an attribute in the form of a noun, this attribute should be logically stressed, but not the main noun ( sorry, can't remember the grammar term).
a knife handle
a silver knife handle
a love paradize
the future love paradize
If the attribute denotes some material, it's either not stressed or stressed much less than the main noun.
a stone house
a long metal bar
Regards![]()
You might be right, but omit for in that phrase. Thus, it should be:
It's an issue that warrants some attention.Stress.
a knife handle (yes)In the phrase a silver knife handle the stress would go on the word the speaker wants to emphasize.
a silver knife handle (yes)
a silver knife handle (yes)
a love paradise (yes)
a (or the) future love paradise (yes)
~R
Thank you, Ron.
Yes, I mixed them up: a warrant for, to warrant sth.
Sure enough, we can stress just anything, including articles and prepositions. I meant a typical stress.
Of course, knife and love are actually adjectives in these phrases.
What some like to call nominal ajectives.