Thread: "will have tested" vs "will test"

1. Junior Member
Join Date
Jul 2005
Posts
69

"will have tested" vs "will test"

Could you please tell me if the following sentence is correct or not...and if not, why not.

"We call him 'safety guy' because before trying something or going somewhere, he will have tested everything to be certain that it is not dangerous."

Catherine C.

2. Member
Join Date
Mar 2007
Posts
344

Re: "will have tested" vs "will test"

Looks good to me. You don't need "will have" because you have "before", so "tests" is adequate, but "will have" is not wrong; it just suggests that he has tested it long before he tries it.

3. Junior Member
Join Date
Jul 2005
Posts
69

Re: "will have tested" vs "will test"

Thanks very much!

4. Junior Member
Join Date
Jul 2005
Posts
69

Re: "will have tested" vs "will test"

Anywone else? Teachers/moderators???

5. Newbie
Join Date
Mar 2007
Posts
16

Re: "will have tested" vs "will test"

". . . it just suggests that he has tested it long before he tries it."

All that and more. Simply reverse the clause order to see.

"We call him 'safety guy,' because he will have tested everything to be certain that it is not dangerous before trying something or going somewhere, ."

So, now, which one has that certain touch of the "Catherinesque"?

6. Re: "will have tested" vs "will test"

The future perfect also gives it the implication that 'he's a reliable chap and you can be sure he will have done his job thoroughly'.

b

7. Banned
Join Date
Aug 2006
Posts
3,064

Re: "will have tested" vs "will test"

Originally Posted by Catherine C.
Could you please tell me if the following sentence is correct or not...and if not, why not.
"We call him 'safety guy' because before trying something or going somewhere, he will have tested everything to be certain that it is not dangerous."
Catherine C.
In this case, 'will have tested' points to a type of theoretical condition or a general condition. The discussion isn't actually focusing on an event for if that were the case then this would be a past time reference and we wouldn't be looking at a future perfect.

A past situation: [a person thinking about a specific time referent, say yesterday, and remarking on what they believed happened]

"Don't worry about these tests being dangerous, because he will have tested them yet again.

Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1