Forum newsfeeds |  | | Notices | You are welcome to answer questions posted in the Ask a Teacher forum as long as your suggestions, help, and advice reflect a good understanding of the English language. If you are not a teacher, you will need to state that clearly at the top of your post. Please note, all posts are moderated by our in-house language experts, so make sure your suggestions, help, and advice house the kind of information an international language teacher would offer. If not, and your posts do not contribute to the topic in a positive way, they will be subject to deletion. | 
14-Mar-2007, 01:50
| | | Subject + Verb to be + To + V1 Dear sir,
I don't understand about the meaning of some sentences which having their structure as Subject + Verb to be + To + V1, such as
He was to receive $1,000 in each month for this job but he was never paid.
I guess this sentence would have meaning that the subject, he, was supposed to earn $1,000 for his salary. It should be replaced with the normal structures and re-written as
He was supposed to receive $1,000 in each month for this job but he was never paid.
Or
He was promised to pay $1,000 in each month for this job but he was never paid.
Therefore, Subject + Verb to be + To + V1 is Subject + Verb in for of passive voice. Do I understand in the right way?
Tony | 
14-Mar-2007, 03:39
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Country: Australia
Posts: 49
Current Location: Australia First Language: English Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Re: Subject + Verb to be + To + V1 Hmmm . . .
To begin, top_man, I think that you mean: ‘He was to receive $1,000 FOR each month IN the job,’ and ‘He was to receive $1,000 for each month . . .’
No, it’s not a passive-voice structure. It is a member of a ‘family’ of structures – less and less common now – that are not part of the sixteen-tense system that is taught to students. The family contains sentences such as:
I was to be shot
I was to have been promoted
I have a chapter in my grammar that details these. If you can get the moderator’s permission, I will post the chapter. | 
17-Mar-2007, 12:46
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Country: Thailand
Posts: 2
Current Location: Bangkok First Language: Thai Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Re: Subject + Verb to be + To + V1 I still don't undertsand the meaning of the posted sentence.
He was to be shot. (So, Was he shot?)
He was to have been promoted. (So, Was he promoted? or Has he been promoted?)
He was to receive. (So, Did he receive?)
As it can be seen from many newspapers, the aforesiad sentence structure has been used manytimes. I don't agree it's less common now. I saw it in New York Times. Sorry, I'm not an English-native speaker. | 
18-Mar-2007, 05:46
| | Editor, UsingEnglish.com | | Join Date: Nov 2002 Country: UK
Posts: 25,015
Current Location: Phnom Penh First Language: English Thanks: 1
Thanked 189 Times in 184 Posts
| | Re: Subject + Verb to be + To + V1 He was to be shot- This means that at the time referred to, the shooting was planned for a later time. It could mean either that he was shot or not according to the context.
He was to have been promoted- not promoted | 
18-Mar-2007, 08:08
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: May 2006 Country: Belarus
Posts: 1,335
First Language: Russian Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
| | Re: Subject + Verb to be + To + V1 Hi, He was to be shot. - We don't know if he was shot. He was to have been promoted. - No, he wasn't promoted.
The Perfect Infinitive often denotes sth that did not happen. You might have done that yourself! - You didn't do it. I could have played better. - Too late, I am sorry I played so badly.
Regards | 
18-Mar-2007, 09:56
|  | Member | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Country: Turkey
Posts: 233
Current Location: Istanbul First Language: Turkish Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Re: Subject + Verb to be + To + V1 A total of 10 soldiers from a Scottish regiment "are to be" dismissed from the Army after failing drug tests. Is it " They are going to be dismissed" ? | 
18-Mar-2007, 14:02
|  | Member | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Country: Turkey
Posts: 233
Current Location: Istanbul First Language: Turkish Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Re: Subject + Verb to be + To + V1 Does It mean " A total of 10 soldiers from a Scottish regiment are being dismissed/going to be dismissed ...... ? | 
18-Mar-2007, 14:28
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: May 2006 Country: Belarus
Posts: 1,335
First Language: Russian Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
| | Re: Subject + Verb to be + To + V1 They must be dismissed, and it's been arranged. | 
01-Apr-2007, 04:23
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Country: Thailand
Posts: 2
Current Location: Bangkok First Language: Thai Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Re: Subject + Verb to be + To + V1 Thank you very much everyone.
TOPPY | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
Similar Threads | | Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | | Usage Of "does" | crool | Ask a Teacher | 7 | 09-Aug-2007 15:56 | | verbs | eyescold_07 | Ask a Teacher | 1 | 08-Aug-2005 05:32 | | Subject and Verb | jack | Ask a Teacher | 14 | 09-Dec-2004 00:14 | | noun phrases | sting | Ask a Teacher | 1 | 26-Aug-2004 20:52 | | Subject of a verb | Anonymous | Linguistics | 10 | 14-Oct-2003 06:10 | All times are GMT. The time now is 07:18. |  |