#1  
Old 10-Apr-2004, 18:06
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Relative clause

Please be nice and explain the following sentence to me.

#1 I have a cat which/ that/ who is very cute.

Which of them are correct?

And are there animals that you can write with "who"?

Thanks a lot................
  #2  
Old 10-Apr-2004, 19:05
MikeNewYork's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,073
Member Type: Academic
Default Re: Relative clause

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Please be nice and explain the following sentence to me.

#1 I have a cat which/ that/ who is very cute.

Which of them are correct?

And are there animals that you can write with "who"?

Thanks a lot................
The choice of a relative pronoun used to introduce a relative clause depends on a number of things. The first consideration is whether the clause is restrictive (needed for the sentence's meaning) or non-restrictive (additional information that is not needed for the sentence's meaning).

In this case, it could be either. If your point is that that cat you have is cute, the clause is restrictive. If your point is that you own a cat, and then you just happen to mention that the cat is cute, the clause is nonrestrictive. Restrictive clauses are not set off with commas; non-restrictive clauses are set off with commas.

The uses of "which" and "that" are a bit different in American English and British English. Both varieties of English use only "which" in non-restrictive clauses. In AE, we tend to use only "that" for restrictive clauses. In BE, both "which" and "that" are used in restrictive clauses.
In both varieties, "who" can be used for either restrictive or non-restrictive clauses. Either "that" or "who" can be used for a person, though most people prefer "who". Many, but not all, would be comfortable using "who" for an animal.

John: Do you have any pets?
AE Mary: I have a cat, who/which is very cute. (non-restrictive)
BE Mary: I have a cat, who/which is very cute. (non-restrictive)

John: I have never seen a cute cat.
AE Mary: I have a cat who/that is very cute. (restrictive)
BE Mary: I have a cat who/that/which is very cute. (restrictive)

Does that help? :wink:
  #3  
Old 11-Apr-2004, 14:06
Editor, UsingEnglish.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 34,358
Home Country: UK
Native Language: British English
Current Location: Philippines
Member Type: English Teacher
Default

'Who' for animals is normally confined to pets- I wouldn't use it for a cow in a field, even if it were a very cute cow- I wouldn't even use 'she' there.
  #4  
Old 11-Apr-2004, 15:35
MikeNewYork's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,073
Member Type: Academic
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tdol
'Who' for animals is normally confined to pets- I wouldn't use it for a cow in a field, even if it were a very cute cow- I wouldn't even use 'she' there.
I know many dairy farmers who would disagree with that. I do agree, however, that it depends on one's level of attachment. We referred to the lion "him" and "he" quite frequently. :wink:
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
relative, clause


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
relative clause hela Ask a Teacher 5 11-Jun-2004 00:15
relative clause Jesse Huang Ask a Teacher 5 12-Feb-2004 17:01
Relative Clause Anonymous Ask a Teacher 2 09-Jul-2003 19:46


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:55.



Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.