Forum newsfeeds |  | | Notices | You are welcome to answer questions posted in the Ask a Teacher forum as long as your suggestions, help, and advice reflect a good understanding of the English language. If you are not a teacher, you will need to state that clearly at the top of your post. Please note, all posts are moderated by our in-house language experts, so make sure your suggestions, help, and advice house the kind of information an international language teacher would offer. If not, and your posts do not contribute to the topic in a positive way, they will be subject to deletion. | 
19-May-2007, 04:09
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Country: Singapore
Posts: 1,096
Current Location: Singapore First Language: English Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | were/would 1. If I were more forgetful, I would write 'Young Man the the Sea' instead of 'Old Man and the Sea.'
2. If I had been more forgetful, I would have written 'Young Man the the Sea' instead of 'Old Man and the Sea.'
If the first sentence correct or should I use the second sentence? Is there a difference in meaning between the two sentences? | 
19-May-2007, 09:48
| | Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Country: UK
Posts: 14,082
Current Location: UK First Language: English Thanks: 2
Thanked 2,512 Times in 2,363 Posts
| | Re: were/would To be quite honest, both sentences make no sense to me at all. I think it is your use of "forgetful" which is wrong - "careless" is a better word for this purpose. If rephrased this way, then I would use "might" in the first example; the second would be fine.
1. If I were more careless, I might write 'Young Man the the Sea' instead of 'Old Man and the Sea.'
2. If I had been more careless, I would have written 'Young Man the the Sea' instead of 'Old Man and the Sea.' | 
19-May-2007, 10:06
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Country: Singapore
Posts: 1,096
Current Location: Singapore First Language: English Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Re: were/would Quote:
Originally Posted by Anglika To be quite honest, both sentences make no sense to me at all. I think it is your use of "forgetful" which is wrong - "careless" is a better word for this purpose. If rephrased this way, then I would use "might" in the first example; the second would be fine.
1. If I were more careless, I might write 'Young Man the the Sea' instead of 'Old Man and the Sea.'
2. If I had been more careless, I would have written 'Young Man the the Sea' instead of 'Old Man and the Sea.' | Hi Anglika
Thanks for your reply.
What I mean is that I had forgotten that the title of the book is 'Old Man and the Sea', and so wrote 'Young Man and the Sea'. It was not because I was careless, but because I had forgotten the correct title of the book.
With the above information, do the sentences make sense?
Thanks once again. | 
19-May-2007, 10:20
| | Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Country: UK
Posts: 14,082
Current Location: UK First Language: English Thanks: 2
Thanked 2,512 Times in 2,363 Posts
| | Re: were/would On the basis that you had forgotten the title, then the use of "if" is wrong. "Because I was forgetful, I wrote..." OR "Because I am forgetful, I might/could have written..."
The conditionals you have used don't fit into your context, which seems to be a direct statement of cause and effect.
nb{The Old Man and the Sea] | 
19-May-2007, 10:25
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Country: Singapore
Posts: 1,096
Current Location: Singapore First Language: English Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Re: were/would Thanks, Anglika.
Yes "The Old Man and the Sea'. Thanks, too. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT. The time now is 21:07. |  |