-
Re: pop-up
Please be reminded. This is not a chatroom. Please make sure your comments deal with the poster's question.
-
Re: pop-up
For one thing, the unclear antecedent for "that" made me wonder if the book or the president was supposed to be the pop-up.
You couldn't have said it better, Delmobile. I thought the sentence meant that the president was the pop-up.
That said, could the sentence be corrected so that the pronoun - antecedent relationship is clear?
-
Re: pop-up
Thank you for leading us away from the kitchen, HaraKiriBlade. :)
Hmmm, let's see. It will be quite interesting reading a book by a president that's a pop-up. I suppose there is an argument to be made that, since "who" is usually the pronoun we use for people, the antecedent is clear enough, but I disagree.
First, I would add the word "book." There are too many things in American culture that pop up for "pop-up" to be immediately clear as a book, in my opinion.
"It will be interesting to read a pop-up book by a former president" would work, but the writer is trying to hold the word "pop-up" until the very end of the sentence, to avoid giving away the joke. I think I would write, "It will be quite interesting reading a former president's pop-up book." Might even make it "United States president," to contrast that stately office with the ridiculous "pop-uo book."
-
Re: pop-up

Originally Posted by
esltutor
Your welcome, Delmobile.
Um, didn't you leave something out?
-
Re: pop-up
...reading a book by a president that's a pop-up. Isn't the author referring to Bill.
-
Re: pop-up
-
Re: pop-up

Originally Posted by
RonBee
Um, didn't you leave something out?

Sure did! I guess that's what I get for reading this forum at 1am. I'll leave the error to prove I'm human.
Cheers,
Debra
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules

Search Engine Optimization by
vBSEO 3.6.1