
08-May-2004, 17:43
|
 | VIP Member | | Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,073
Member Type: Academic | |
Re: three sentences confusing me Quote: |
Originally Posted by Joe 1) The pleasantest was to dine at some expensive restaurant; and then, after declaring insolvency, be handed over quietly and without uproar to a policeman.
I don't quite understand the blue part. Could you please rephrase it? | To me, it sounds as if the writer is a con artist (a dishonest person who fools other people). He seems to be talking about his past, which involved dressing up and going out to eat at an expensive restaurant. After the meal was completed, he announced that he had no money to pay the bill. The restaurant then called the police and they took him away for "theft". Quote: 2) ...but the US officials denied the move had to do with alleged mistreatment of prisoners.
Does "had to do with" account to "had anything to do with" here?
| Yes it does. When one adds "anything", it makes the denial a bit stronger. Quote: 3) "We need as Americans to be a bright, shining light for the treatment of prisoners, " he said. ("Otherwise, we have no right to ask that of our adversaries.")
I don't quite understand the "need as Americans to be" structure. Could you explain it or the sentence, please?
| That sentence could be helped by better punctuation.
We need, as Americans, to be a bright, shining light for the treatment of prisoners, " he said.
The phrase "as Americans" is used to highlight a particular aspect of "we". In this case it means We (because we are Americans) need to...
:wink: |