#11  
Old 01-Jul-2007, 20:13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 557
Member Type: Other
Default Re: sign of the times

Thank you so much, Bob K, for slicing the Gordian knot of prepositional subtlety.

ian2, you're there, but putting "which is a sign of the times" right after "messaging" (even though they are divided by a comma) makes it sound like the messaging itself is a sign of the times, while it is their effectiveness that is the point of the sentence.

"The fact that their most effective tool was cell phone short messaging is a sign of the times."


a
  #12  
Old 01-Jul-2007, 21:05
RonBee's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,539
Home Country: United States
Native Language: American English
Current Location: United States
Member Type: Other
Default Re: sign of the times

Quote:
Originally Posted by ian2 View Post
In a sign of the times, their most effective tool to spread their message was cell phone short messaging.
It is my impression that the sign of the times is the use of cell phones. (Cell phones didn't even exist in the previous generation.)

~R
  #13  
Old 02-Jul-2007, 05:37
Member
Threadstarter  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 431
Home Country: China
Native Language: Chinese
Current Location: United States
Member Type: Other
Default Re: sign of the times

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delmobile View Post
Thank you so much, Bob K, for slicing the Gordian knot of prepositional subtlety.

ian2, you're there, but putting "which is a sign of the times" right after "messaging" (even though they are divided by a comma) makes it sound like the messaging itself is a sign of the times, while it is their effectiveness that is the point of the sentence.

"The fact that their most effective tool was cell phone short messaging is a sign of the times."


a
You are right. But in my interpretation, "which" refers to the whole previous sentence rather than the messaging itself. So far as I know, the relative pronoun "which" can be used to refer to a whole main clause. Also I would not narrow "the sign of the times" to "effectiveness" only. How can "effectiveness" be a sign of the times. As Ronbee, the moderator, says, the "sign of the times" is the use of the cell phone. I kind of agree with that interpretation, as cell phone is a new thing, but "effectiveness" is timeless. right? My two cents. I have learned so much from so many. Thank you all.
  #14  
Old 02-Jul-2007, 14:32
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 557
Member Type: Other
Default Re: sign of the times

You are right---"which" can introduce clauses that modify the entire sentence, or only part of it.

"He visited New Orleans last year, which was his first trip away from home."

"Last year he visited New Orleans, which he had always thought of as a sinful and Godforsaken city."

How can "effectiveness" be a sign of the times? If they'd tried using short messaging a few years before, when not so many people had cell phones, the technique, while still striking and innovative, might not have been their most effective tool, or even effective at all. That is how I saw the sentence, but as you point out RonBee sees it differently. And it's splitting hairs to argue over it anyway; the point the author is making (new technology has empowered grassroots citizen action!) is clear either way.

The important thing was the as/in conflict, which I think we have successfully dealt with, thanks to BobK.

I've learned a lot from this board too; I don't think I've ever spent so much time considering the power of the humble preposition.
  #15  
Old 02-Jul-2007, 23:06
Member
Threadstarter  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 431
Home Country: China
Native Language: Chinese
Current Location: United States
Member Type: Other
Default Re: sign of the times

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delmobile View Post
You are right---"which" can introduce clauses that modify the entire sentence, or only part of it.

"He visited New Orleans last year, which was his first trip away from home."

"Last year he visited New Orleans, which he had always thought of as a sinful and Godforsaken city."

How can "effectiveness" be a sign of the times? If they'd tried using short messaging a few years before, when not so many people had cell phones, the technique, while still striking and innovative, might not have been their most effective tool, or even effective at all. That is how I saw the sentence, but as you point out RonBee sees it differently. And it's splitting hairs to argue over it anyway; the point the author is making (new technology has empowered grassroots citizen action!) is clear either way.

The important thing was the as/in conflict, which I think we have successfully dealt with, thanks to BobK.

I've learned a lot from this board too; I don't think I've ever spent so much time considering the power of the humble preposition.
I totally agree. In an age when money is always thought to be powerful by so many, the humble preposition is showing its power in the corner of a text. Long Live language!

Ian2
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
sign, times


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
While + several times? Progress Ask a Teacher 2 25-Nov-2006 15:42
sign in vs sign up adullstudent Ask a Teacher 2 28-Aug-2006 23:12
Please - what word describes "Three Times Per Year" ranieri71 Ask a Teacher 2 29-Jul-2005 23:44
in times; at time ripley Ask a Teacher 2 06-Mar-2005 11:20
finding difficulty to sign in! Farhaj1 Ask a Teacher 2 01-Mar-2005 10:08


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:02.



Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.