Forum newsfeeds |  | | Notices | You are welcome to answer questions posted in the Ask a Teacher forum as long as your suggestions, help, and advice reflect a good understanding of the English language. If you are not a teacher, you will need to state that clearly at the top of your post. Please note, all posts are moderated by our in-house language experts, so make sure your suggestions, help, and advice house the kind of information an international language teacher would offer. If not, and your posts do not contribute to the topic in a positive way, they will be subject to deletion. | 
20-Jul-2007, 03:23
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: May 2007 Country: Hong Kong
Posts: 606
Current Location: Hong Kong First Language: Chinese Member Type: Other Thanks: 7
Thanked 47 Times in 47 Posts
| | Firstly, secondly, thirdly... Nowadays, we usually say, Firstly, ... Secondly, ... Thirdly,... when listing of points. However, Michael Dummett in his "Grammar & Style" said the otherwise as follows:
"First can be either an adjective, as in 'The first man on the moon', or an adverb, as in 'He first filled the kettle and then put it on the stove'.
The form firstly is therefore as redundant as fastly would be, and should never be used. Hence an enumeration of points hould proceed: First, ...Secondly, ... Thirdly, .... The (fairly rare) exception occurs when there is a definite noun for the ordinal numberals to qualify, in which case we need first, ... , second, ... , third...: an example is 'He made three objections: first, that...; second, that...; and, third, that....'"
Any comments on that, dear teachers. | 
20-Jul-2007, 07:31
| | Editor, UsingEnglish.com | | Join Date: Nov 2002 Country: UK
Posts: 25,661
Current Location: Phnom Penh First Language: English Member Type: English Teacher Thanks: 6
Thanked 536 Times in 472 Posts
| | Re: Firstly, secondly, thirdly... I think his argument is flawed; many adverbs have two forms, so the analogy with 'fastly' is off the mark. | 
20-Jul-2007, 07:57
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: May 2007 Country: Hong Kong
Posts: 606
Current Location: Hong Kong First Language: Chinese Member Type: Other Thanks: 7
Thanked 47 Times in 47 Posts
| | Re: Firstly, secondly, thirdly... Quote:
Originally Posted by Tdol I think his argument is flawed; many adverbs have two forms, so the analogy with 'fastly' is off the mark. | Well, since the publication was made in 1993, the use of firstly and first might have changed in the course of time. BTW, having referred to the definition of Longman Dict as well, I do agree with your comment. Thanks, Tdol. Longman Dict.
Firstly:
used to say that the fact or reason that you are going to mention is the first one and will be followed by others
see also finally, lastly Firstly, I would like to thank everyone who has contributed to this success. | 
21-Jul-2007, 08:17
| | Editor, UsingEnglish.com | | Join Date: Nov 2002 Country: UK
Posts: 25,661
Current Location: Phnom Penh First Language: English Member Type: English Teacher Thanks: 6
Thanked 536 Times in 472 Posts
| | Re: Firstly, secondly, thirdly... It's an expression of his preferences and doesn't reflect usage. | 
21-Jul-2007, 10:20
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Country: Tunisia
Posts: 882
Current Location: Tunis First Language: Arabic Member Type: Student or Learner Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
| | Re: Firstly, secondly, thirdly... My Enlish teacher said so too
She said it is awkward ,informal and redundant to use firstly....secondly and thirdly.
I don't why?
May she has the same book . | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT. The time now is 08:52. |  |