-
to not seek
"The decision to not seek compensation from the 16-year-old boy was made in agreement with..."
Should it be "to not seek" as it is or "not to seek"? I am pretty sure I should know that as there must be a strict rule, quite a basic one. And till now I have been sure it should be "not to seek", so finding the former was quite a amazement for me. Hence my question.
Best,
Nyggus
-
Re: to not seek
It's a rather old rule to never split an infinitive
. Nonetheless, it's still clung to by some.
Personally, I read "to not seek" and "not to seek" as the same. Sometimes I can "hear" a difference between asking someone not to do something and asking them to not-do, but it's often subtle.
I would advise you to try to avoid splitting the infinitive in your own writing (because you may be read by people who still hold that rule infallible), but not to worry about it when you read it elsewhere.
[a writer, not a teacher]
Last edited by Barb_D; 13-Aug-2007 at 14:30.
-
Re: to not seek
OK, thanks, Barb_D. I will not worry and will not use the split infinitive wherever possible
. I think sometimes there's a much stronger desire, and even there might be a need, to use it than it is in this particular situation and others similar to it.
Nyggus
Similar Threads
-
By piousoul in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 3
Last Post: 28-Jan-2007, 19:25
-
By Lait in forum Linguistics
Replies: 2
Last Post: 24-Jan-2007, 10:15
-
By ben9108 in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 1
Last Post: 03-Sep-2006, 11:38
-
By **C@RL$$** in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 2
Last Post: 08-Jun-2006, 20:35
-
By sbuchalla in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 2
Last Post: 24-Feb-2004, 21:59
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules

Search Engine Optimization by
vBSEO 3.6.1