#1  
Old 28-May-2004, 12:06
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Borges's ancient Chinese encyclopedia

Hi,

I am now reading "Kant and the Platypus" written by Umberto Eco and needs to translate the book into Chinese. I am not quite sure about the meaning of the following paragraph, especially the underlined part. Could anyone do me a favor. Thanks in advance.

What has Kant got to do with the platypus? Nothing. As we shall see from the dates, he couldn't have had anything to do with it. And this should suffice to justify the title and its use of an incongruous set that sounds like a tribute to Borges's ancient Chinese encyclopedia.
  #2  
Old 28-May-2004, 20:51
MikeNewYork's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,073
Member Type: Academic
Default Re: Borges's ancient Chinese encyclopedia

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ya
Hi,

I am now reading "Kant and the Platypus" written by Umberto Eco and needs to translate the book into Chinese. I am not quite sure about the meaning of the following paragraph, especially the underlined part. Could anyone do me a favor. Thanks in advance.

What has Kant got to do with the platypus? Nothing. As we shall see from the dates, he couldn't have had anything to do with it. And this should suffice to justify the title and its use of an incongruous set that sounds like a tribute to Borges's ancient Chinese encyclopedia.
An incongruous set or an incongruity is something in which the two parts do not agree or are not in harmony with each other. Kant was a German philosopher. He had nothing to do with strange egg-laying mammals from Australia. Similarly, Borges, as an Argentine writer, had nothing to do with ancient Chinese reference books. :?
  #3  
Old 29-May-2004, 12:09
Casiopea's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,971
Member Type: Other
Default Re: Borges's ancient Chinese encyclopedia

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ya
Hi,

I am now reading "Kant and the Platypus" written by Umberto Eco and needs to translate the book into Chinese. I am not quite sure about the meaning of the following paragraph, especially the underlined part. Could anyone do me a favor. Thanks in advance.

What has Kant got to do with the platypus? Nothing. As we shall see from the dates, he couldn't have had anything to do with it. And this should suffice to justify the title and its use of an incongruous set that sounds like a tribute to Borges's ancient Chinese encyclopedia.
In addition to Mike's wonderful explanation, Click Here to read a book review of Kant and the Platypus

With regards to the title "Kant and the Platypus" as an incongruous set of words (i.e. signs), I've borrowed the following words

Quote:
Originally Posted by Domenico Pacitti
...the beauty of expression is such that it unfailingly convinces the reader of its truth, while at the same time masking unresolved contradictions beneath the surface
All the best,
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
borgess, ancient, chinese, encyclopedia


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Language teaching problem Eway General Language Discussions 18 02-Apr-2009 02:36
Travel / Traveling Overseas eric2004 Ask a Teacher 63 06-Jan-2004 21:17
Excellent online Chinese > English dictionary shane General Language Discussions 13 25-Jun-2003 14:51


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:11.



Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.