Forum newsfeeds |  | | Notices | You are welcome to answer questions posted in the Ask a Teacher forum as long as your suggestions, help, and advice reflect a good understanding of the English language. If you are not a teacher, you will need to state that clearly at the top of your post. Please note, all posts are moderated by our in-house language experts, so make sure your suggestions, help, and advice house the kind of information an international language teacher would offer. If not, and your posts do not contribute to the topic in a positive way, they will be subject to deletion. | 
21-Aug-2007, 09:59
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: May 2004 Country: Czech Republic
Posts: 858
Current Location: Czech Republic First Language: Czech Member Type: Student or Learner Thanks: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
| | active vs. passive voice Cambridge University Press: Common mistakes at CAE (Debra Powell) - chapter 2: Quote:
We use active forms of perfect tenses to describe a situation which has changed: It's really stormy - the roof has blown off! | I don't understand why the (should I write the article here?) active voice was used here (instead of the passive one!). The roof was blown off by the wind, wasn't it? It couldn't have blown off itself! Why was the active form of the verb used, then? Does it have anything to do with the present perfect tense?
Cambridge University Press: English Grammar in Use (Raymond Murphy) - unit 42 (an exercise): Quote: | A tree was lying across the road. (it / blow down / in the storm) | I thought that if the active voice was used in the first example (about the roof), it should be used in this sentence as well.
That's why I thought that the correct sentence (formed from the words in brackets) was " It has blown down in the storm.", but the correct answer was " It has BEEN blown down in the storm."
I am really confused now!! Could you clarify it to me, please? | 
21-Aug-2007, 10:58
|  | VIP Member | | Join Date: Sep 2003 Country: Canada
Posts: 12,997
Current Location: China First Language: English Member Type: Other Thanks: 0
Thanked 40 Times in 39 Posts
| | Re: active vs. passive voice Present Perfect: when the event occurred is either unknown or not important. Here it is unknown: Ex: It is really stormy right now. The roof's blown off. Perfect Passive: same as above plus, when the agent of the event is unknown. Ex: A tree was lying across the road. It's been blown down. _____________ Suggestion
I don't undestand why active voice was used here. | 
21-Aug-2007, 11:27
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: May 2004 Country: Czech Republic
Posts: 858
Current Location: Czech Republic First Language: Czech Member Type: Student or Learner Thanks: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
| | Re: active vs. passive voice Quote:
Originally Posted by Casiopea Present Perfect: when the event occurred is either unknown or not important. Here it is unknown: Ex: It is really stormy right now. The roof's blown off. Perfect Passive: same as above plus, when the agent of the event is unknown. Ex: A tree was lying across the road. It's been blown down. _____________ Suggestion
I don't undestand why active voice was used here. | Thank you Casiopea, but I think you missed the point of my question (or I didn't understand your exlpanation). I think I know and understand when the (I never know when to write and omit articles... Is it correct here?) present perfect tense should be used but I don't know why the first sentence was told in active, while the second in passive voice.
(Correct my mistakes, please! I am never sure about when to use articles etc.  )
-------------
Editing:
I think I should leave he article " the" out, right?
Last edited by Lenka; 21-Aug-2007 at 11:32.
Reason: the article
| 
21-Aug-2007, 11:44
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Country: Poland
Posts: 1,143
Current Location: Swindon, England First Language: Polish Member Type: Student or Learner Thanks: 10
Thanked 178 Times in 169 Posts
| | Re: active vs. passive voice It's really stormy - the roof has blown off!
To me, the phrasal verb 'blow off' is intransitive; therefore you can't say that 'the roof was blown off'.
*****************
A tree was lying across the road. (it / blow down / in the storm) It has been blown down in the storm.
Unlike with the previous verb, this time 'blow down' is a transitive phrasal verb. The storm has blown the tree down.
The tree has been blown down in the storm.
___________________________
NOTE:  Bear in mind I'm not a teacher!  | 
21-Aug-2007, 12:16
|  | VIP Member | | Join Date: Sep 2003 Country: Canada
Posts: 12,997
Current Location: China First Language: English Member Type: Other Thanks: 0
Thanked 40 Times in 39 Posts
| | Re: active vs. passive voice Quote:
Originally Posted by engee30 It's really stormy - the roof has blown off!
To me, the phrasal verb 'blow off' is intransitive; therefore you can't say that 'the roof was blown off'.
***************** | Excellent explanation.  _________ Suggestion
I think I know when (the) present perfect tense should be used. | 
21-Aug-2007, 12:30
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Country: Poland
Posts: 1,143
Current Location: Swindon, England First Language: Polish Member Type: Student or Learner Thanks: 10
Thanked 178 Times in 169 Posts
| | Re: active vs. passive voice Quote:
Originally Posted by Casiopea Excellent explanation.   | I should hope so.  Thanks. | 
21-Aug-2007, 12:33
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: May 2004 Country: Czech Republic
Posts: 858
Current Location: Czech Republic First Language: Czech Member Type: Student or Learner Thanks: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
| | Re: active vs. passive voice Quote:
Originally Posted by engee30 It's really stormy - the roof has blown off!
To me, the phrasal verb 'blow off' is intransitive; therefore you can't say that 'the roof was blown off'.
*****************
A tree was lying across the road. (it / blow down / in the storm) It has been blown down in the storm.
Unlike with the previous verb, this time 'blow down' is a transitive phrasal verb. The storm has blown the tree down.
The tree has been blown down in the storm.
___________________________
NOTE:  Bear in mind I'm not a teacher!  | Hmm... Thanks, Engee... It seems to be the problem of mine.
How do I recognize that "blow off" is an intransitive verb? I know what the expressions "transitive and intransitive verbs" mean but I can't simply recognize if the verb blow off takes an object.
I've tried to search the word in some Internet dictionaries:
=> It is said here ( blow off - Wiktionary) that "blow off" means "to fart", which it does not in my sentence, apparently. And yes, you're right - it's considered an intransitive verb here.. in the meaning of "to fart", though.
=> Here ( Cambridge Dictionaries Online - Cambridge University Press) it is said the verb can be either transitive or intransitive.
An example sentence is mentioned there: I blew the dust off the books. Here it is used as a transitive verb. Why? What is the difference between I blew the dust off the books. and The roof has blown off! ? I guess that it has a different meaning, right? To blow off sth (= from what) vs. to blow off.... A I right? How can I recognize it?
By the way, is it impossible to say "The wind blew the roof off."? Why? I know, the reason is that it is an intransitive verb, as you said, but... how can I recognize it? :( | 
21-Aug-2007, 12:40
|  | VIP Member | | Join Date: Sep 2003 Country: Canada
Posts: 12,997
Current Location: China First Language: English Member Type: Other Thanks: 0
Thanked 40 Times in 39 Posts
| | Re: active vs. passive voice A little help with meaning, here. Both examples express the same meaning, but the second one expresses more than just the one meaning:
Ex1: The wind blew the roof off. 
Meaning: removed it from its frame
Ex2: The wind blew off the roof. 
Meaning 1: removed it from its frame.
Meaning 2: ignored it (idiom) and not applicable to Ex2., didn't do something; e.g., Max blew off the exam. She didn't go.> | 
21-Aug-2007, 12:50
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Country: Poland
Posts: 1,143
Current Location: Swindon, England First Language: Polish Member Type: Student or Learner Thanks: 10
Thanked 178 Times in 169 Posts
| | Re: active vs. passive voice Quote:
Originally Posted by Lenka Hmm... Thanks, Engee... It seems to be the problem of mine.
Here ( Cambridge Dictionaries Online - Cambridge University Press) it is said the verb can be either transitive or intransitive.
An example sentence is mentioned there: I blew the dust off the books. Here it is used as a transitive verb. Why? What is the difference between I blew the dust off the books. and T[b]he roof has blown off!? | That's the point - to know and be able to distinguish between intransitive and transitive verbs is the key!
The verb itself, blew, can be both transitive and intransitive; but when a particle is added, it changes significantly, and usually becomes a phrasal verb. I blew the dust off the books. - here, off is not a particle, but forms the prepositional phrase, off the books.  | 
21-Aug-2007, 13:06
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Country: sweden
Posts: 1,029
Current Location: stockholm First Language: swedish Member Type: Academic Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
| | Re: active vs. passive voice Quote:
Originally Posted by Lenka Cambridge University Press: Common mistakes at CAE (Debra Powell) - chapter 2:
I don't understand why the (should I write the article here?) active voice was used here (instead of the passive one!). *The active voice is usually more direct and vigorous than the passive. *yes, the active voice (with a definite article) | To me, this is a matter of style. AV: It's really stormy - the roof has blown off! PV: It's really stormy - the roof was blown off (by the wind)!.
The latter sentence is less direct, less bold, and less concise than the former.
Last edited by bianca; 21-Aug-2007 at 13:12.
| | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT. The time now is 04:08. |  |