Forum newsfeeds |  | | Notices | You are welcome to answer questions posted in the Ask a Teacher forum as long as your suggestions, help, and advice reflect a good understanding of the English language. If you are not a teacher, you will need to state that clearly at the top of your post. Please note, all posts are moderated by our in-house language experts, so make sure your suggestions, help, and advice house the kind of information an international language teacher would offer. If not, and your posts do not contribute to the topic in a positive way, they will be subject to deletion. | 
20-Oct-2007, 01:14
| | Member | | Join Date: May 2007 Country: brazil
Posts: 287
Current Location: brazil First Language: portuguese Thanks: 100
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| | not to or to not.. Hi,
Should I say: They forced me not to do it or They forced me to not do it | 
20-Oct-2007, 02:08
| | Key Member | | Join Date: Aug 2006 Country: Canada
Posts: 3,025
Current Location: Canada First Language: English Thanks: 4
Thanked 478 Times in 440 Posts
| | Re: not to or to not.. Quote:
Originally Posted by bieasy Hi,
Should I say: They forced me not to do it or They forced me to not do it | For this context the second sounds better but as to why, I can't really say. | 
20-Oct-2007, 05:59
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Country: canada
Posts: 1,290
Current Location: canada First Language: english Thanks: 4
Thanked 235 Times in 223 Posts
| | Re: not to or to not.. I agree that the second one sounds better.
I think the reason is that "(he)(she)(they)forced me to" can be considered to be a set phrase and sounds correct, regardless of whether it is followed by a positive or negative action.
Another reason, or maybe just another way of saying the same thing, is that "to not do (something)" is a more direct and emphatic phrase, and sounds better, than the rather limp "not to do something". | 
20-Oct-2007, 22:46
|  | Newbie | | Join Date: Oct 2007 Country: Brazil
Posts: 9
Current Location: Juiz de Fora First Language: Portuguese Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Re: not to or to not.. Quote:
Originally Posted by 2006 I agree that the second one sounds better.
I think the reason is that "(he)(she)(they)forced me to" can be considered to be a set phrase and sounds correct, regardless of whether it is followed by a positive or negative action.
Another reason, or maybe just another way of saying the same thing, is that "to not do (something)" is a more direct and emphatic phrase, and sounds better, than the rather limp "not to do something". | At first, both sound perfectly correct and natural. After analyzing different real examples of usage, I could infer that "NOT TO" is preferred among educated speakers. That may be so because grammar says that the negative of an infinitive is formed by adding NOT before it.
- Drink water.
He told Janny to drink water.
- Don't drink water.
He told Janny not to drink water. | 
20-Oct-2007, 23:07
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Country: canada
Posts: 1,290
Current Location: canada First Language: english Thanks: 4
Thanked 235 Times in 223 Posts
| | Re: not to or to not.. [quote=
- Drink water.
He told Janny to drink water.
- Don't drink water.
He told Janny not to drink water.[/quote]
I think either way is okay in your sentence, but we were specifically talking about the "They forced me..." sentence. | 
21-Oct-2007, 01:05
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Country: Canada
Posts: 1,157
Current Location: Alberta First Language: English Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
| | Re: not to or to not.. Quote:
Originally Posted by bieasy Hi,
Should I say: They forced me not to do it or They forced me to not do it | There is a slight change in meaning between them. They forced me not to do it (I was going to do it but they forced me to give up the idea) They forced me to not do it (I was doing it but they stopped me forcibly)
It is very subtle though.
[/quote] | 
21-Oct-2007, 03:44
| | Key Member | | Join Date: Aug 2006 Country: Canada
Posts: 3,025
Current Location: Canada First Language: English Thanks: 4
Thanked 478 Times in 440 Posts
| | Re: not to or to not.. Quote:
Originally Posted by williambosich At first, both sound perfectly correct and natural. After analyzing different real examples of usage, I could infer that "NOT TO" is preferred among educated speakers. That may be so because grammar says that the negative of an infinitive is formed by adding NOT before it.
- Drink water.
He told Janny to drink water.
- Don't drink water.
He told Janny not to drink water. | I think, William, that you might be mistaking a "preference" for a normal neutral. With certain parts of speech, notably adverbs and negations, a change in position often reflects a change in the strength, in the emphasis. | 
21-Oct-2007, 11:31
|  | Newbie | | Join Date: Oct 2007 Country: Brazil
Posts: 9
Current Location: Juiz de Fora First Language: Portuguese Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Re: not to or to not.. You are surely right! I missed this approach. Thanks for being so tactful. ;-D | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT. The time now is 04:12. |  |