#1  
Old 01-Nov-2007, 09:04
Bushwhacker's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,000
Home Country: Spain
Native Language: Catalan
Current Location: Spain
Member Type: Student or Learner
Cool Gerund after "to"

Please, what's the meaning of a verb in gerund after "to"? Sentence at hand I can provide for instance is the same I put for another previous question: ""First blood refers to the act of drawing blood first to instigating the aggression." What's the nuance behind "to instigating" instead of "to instigate"?

Thank You.
  #2  
Old 01-Nov-2007, 09:24
Key Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,848
Member Type: Student or Learner
Default Re: Gerund after "to"

i am just a student.

very good question!
  #3  
Old 01-Nov-2007, 09:59
Bushwhacker's Avatar
Senior Member
Threadstarter  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,000
Home Country: Spain
Native Language: Catalan
Current Location: Spain
Member Type: Student or Learner
Cool Re: Gerund after "to"

Thank You for interest, but could anyone pay attention to that question?

  #4  
Old 01-Nov-2007, 10:10
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 242
Member Type: Student or Learner
Default Re: Gerund after "to"

For me, it doesn't carry any nuance.
In fact, it just sounds wrong, I would much prefer the infinitive to instigate being used.
  #5  
Old 01-Nov-2007, 10:25
Bushwhacker's Avatar
Senior Member
Threadstarter  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,000
Home Country: Spain
Native Language: Catalan
Current Location: Spain
Member Type: Student or Learner
Cool Re: Gerund after "to"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Niall View Post
For me, it doesn't carry any nuance.
In fact, it just sounds wrong, I would much prefer the infinitive to instigate being used.
Thanks; I don't know if it is correct or not in this concrete case, but all we know expressions like "I'm looking forward to hearing from you". My point is "why "to hearing" and not "to hear."? There must be some kind of intention; a will to mean something like an action which is carry out kind of intensively; mustn't it?

I'll very appreciate your opinion.
  #6  
Old 01-Nov-2007, 10:41
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 242
Member Type: Student or Learner
Default Re: Gerund after "to"

The gerund (or the present participle) is used after a preposition. This is usually as part of a prepositional verb (that is verb + preposition).
For example we use the gerund after believe in, rely on or think of.

The case you mentioned, look forward to, is a phrasal prepositional verb. They are made up of verb + adverb + preposition and therefore, they end in a preposition, and it is necessary to use the gerund.

We cannot say I look forward to hear from you, we must instead use the gerund, so that the sentence says I look forward to hearing from you.

Don't hesitate to ask for further explaination.
  #7  
Old 01-Nov-2007, 10:44
Key Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,869
Home Country: Romania
Native Language: Romanian
Current Location: Romania
Member Type: English Teacher
Default Re: Gerund after "to"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bushwhacker View Post
Thanks; I don't know if it is correct or not in this concrete case, but all we know expressions like "I'm looking forward to hearing from you". My point is "why "to hearing" and not "to hear."? There must be some kind of intention; a will to mean something like an action which is carry out kind of intensively; mustn't it?

I'll very appreciate your opinion.
The verbal expression to be looking forward to takes a gerund after it. It is an established grammar rule.
You can say :

I am looking forward to my vacation [ + noun]

I am looking forward to hearing from / seeing, etc. you [ + gerund]
  #8  
Old 01-Nov-2007, 10:48
Key Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,869
Home Country: Romania
Native Language: Romanian
Current Location: Romania
Member Type: English Teacher
Default Re: Gerund after "to"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bushwhacker View Post
Please, what's the meaning of a verb in gerund after "to"? Sentence at hand I can provide for instance is the same I put for another previous question: ""First blood refers to the act of drawing blood first to instigating the aggression." What's the nuance behind "to instigating" instead of "to instigate"?

Thank You.
The answer might be the following:

First blood refers to the act of drawing blood first to [ before] instigating [ noun] the aggression. It sounds a little bit weird.
  #9  
Old 01-Nov-2007, 10:51
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 242
Member Type: Student or Learner
Default Re: Gerund after "to"

In which first to means before?
  #10  
Old 01-Nov-2007, 10:52
Key Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,869
Home Country: Romania
Native Language: Romanian
Current Location: Romania
Member Type: English Teacher
Default Re: Gerund after "to"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Niall View Post
In which first to means before?
It was just a supposition. It may be wrong.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
use of th gerund bieasy Ask a Teacher 1 17-Aug-2007 02:16
Gerund or participle? Humble Ask a Teacher 18 24-Mar-2007 16:59
Gerund Diagramming Help Tyler07 Analysing and Diagramming Sentences 3 12-Mar-2007 21:33
Gerund or Present Participle? atm Ask a Teacher 1 18-Dec-2006 13:55
gerund or noun pucubuwi Ask a Teacher 4 05-Oct-2006 22:46


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:14.



Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.