Dear teachers,
I have three questions to ask:
No.1
Could you please explain if the following sentences bear the same meaning?
a. It happenened there was no one in the house.
b. No one happened to be in the house.
No.2
Could you please kindly explain the difference between 'fight' and 'battle'? I think the former can refer to children's actions when they hit each other. The latter relates to war. For example, in the battle the enemy was defeated. Is that right?
No.3
Do I say 'The enemy withdrew' or 'the enemies withdrew'? Is there any difference between sigular and plaural form as far as meaning is concerned here?
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Thank you in advance.
Jiang
Last edited by jiang; 23-Nov-2007 at 07:33.
I don't want to go into too much of the reply to these questions as it would take a long time but I must point out the battle/fight question and the examples given to explain the difference. The question related to the meanings of the nouns in question, however the examples were of verbs in the infinitive. A noun and a verb are worlds apart in grammatical phraseology without mixing up the meanings of them!
My advice to the enquirer is to go onto a dictionary website and simply look up the meanings. A pointer though about the general contrast of the two words. These words mean different things to different people. What might be a fight to keep the weight off, might also be a battle with the bulge!!!!! Hopefully you will take my point.
Say:
It happened that there was no one in the house.![]()
a. It happenened that there was no one in the house.The first sentence is ungrammatical without that. (The reason for that doesn't occur to me right now.)
b. No one happened to be in the house.
Both sentences are acceptable but a little odd. More likely:
There was no one in the house.~R