Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 29 of 29
  1. #21
    MikeNewYork's Avatar
    MikeNewYork is offline VIP Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    6,073
    Teacher

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Francois
    Usage rules. Out of mere curiosity, how does the 'more perfect' preamble run?

    FRC
    We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

  2. #22
    Susie Smith Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Francois
    Usage rules. Out of mere curiosity, how does the 'more perfect' preamble run?

    FRC
    PREAMBLE

    We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

    :D

  3. #23
    Susie Smith Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MikeNewYork
    Quote Originally Posted by Francois
    Usage rules. Out of mere curiosity, how does the 'more perfect' preamble run?

    FRC
    We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
    It seems you beat me to it. Beautiful, isn't it!!!!!
    :D

  4. #24
    Susie Smith Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blacknomi
    • Non-gradable adjectives express qualities that cannot be intensified by using degree adverbs such as ‘very’, e.g. *‘very male’.

      Notes The qualities expressed by non-gradable adjectives tend to be absolute, and they often fall into pairs, e.g. ‘male/female’, ‘married/single’, ‘black/white’, ‘true/false’. When such adjectives are modified by degree adverbs like ‘very’, the effect is sometimes to give emphasis rather than to express the degree of the characteristic expressed, e.g. ‘That’s very true’, ‘It was a very black day’. Alternatively, the nature of the adjective is changed: compare ‘I’m Scottish’ (= nationality) with ‘I’m very Scottish’ (= I have many Scottish characteristics).




    FRC, I would like to ask you a question from a point of ESL learner. How can you distinguish from gradable to ungradable/non-gradable ajectives? For me, 'fascinating' is a hard one for me to categorize this as non-gradable adjective. There are some adjectives that I can think of now, would you please check if it is correct.


    non-gradable: perfect/ fabulous/ fantastic/ awesome/ wonderful/ perfect


    Can you provide some nore commonly used adjectives if there is any? Thank you.

    Sources from here
    absolute terms Absolute terms are words that supposedly cannot be compared, as by more and most, or used with an intensive modifier, such as very or so. The terms identified in many handbooks as absolute include absolute itself and others such as chief, complete, perfect, prime and unique. Language comentators also like to list terms from mathematics as absolutes: circular, equal, parallel, perpendicular, and so on.
    Of course, many adjectives cannot normally be compared or intensified. Adjectives from technical fields or with very narrow meanings often fall in this group. Think of biological, catabolic, macroeconomic, millenial,on-line, retroactive, ultraviolet. You just do not encounter statements like These cells are more somatic or Our database is so on-line. But you do come across remarks such as He wanted to make his record collection more complete and You can improve the sketch by making the lines more perpendicular.People object to these constructions because they seem to violate the categories of logic. Something is either complete or it isn't. Lines are either perpendicular or they aren't. There can be no in-between. The mistake here is to confuse pure logic or a mathematical ideal with the working approximations that distinguish the ordinary use of language. Certainly, we all have occasion to use words according to strict logic. But we also think in terms of a scale or spectrum, rather than in distinct, either/or categories. Thus, we may think of a statement as either true or false according to rigorous tests of logic, but we all know that there are degrees of truthfulness and falsehood. Similarly, there may be degrees of completeness to a record collection, and some lines may be more perpendicular - that is, they may more nearly approximate mathematical perpendicularity - than other lines: Is that picture frame more horizontal now, or have I made it even less? She has some of the most unique credentials I have ever seen on a resume. Such examples are not less logical than their stricter counterparts. They simply represent a different way of using language to discuss a subject.
    Certain absolute terms, such as parallel, perfect, and unique, have become enshrined in the lore of writing handbooks and may provoke a negative response when modified by degree. These words are treated in more detail at their entries under Word Choice. (from The American Heritage Book of English Usage)

  5. #25
    Casiopea's Avatar
    Casiopea is offline VIP Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    12,971

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blacknomi

    Cas, what do you mean by "But...people use it"? Is this the case that I just mentioned in my previous post, to give emphasis rather than to express the degree of the characteristic expressed.
    Sure. Why not? If people are using "very fascinating", then we know very is being used in a new way, one that's non-gradable. :D That, however, is not to say that very fascinating is or will be acceptable by all people. Well, not yet. :(

  6. #26
    blacknomi is offline Key Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,814

    Default

    Dear Susan,

    That really helps!!! I understand now. Thanks a bunch.
    I love you. :D :D :D

  7. #27
    blacknomi is offline Key Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,814

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Casiopea
    Quote Originally Posted by blacknomi

    Cas, what do you mean by "But...people use it"? Is this the case that I just mentioned in my previous post, to give emphasis rather than to express the degree of the characteristic expressed.
    Sure. Why not? If people are using "very fascinating", then we know very is being used in a new way, one that's non-gradable. :D That, however, is not to say that very fascinating is or will be acceptable by all people. Well, not yet. :(
    Thanks, Dear pretty Cas. :D

  8. #28
    MikeNewYork's Avatar
    MikeNewYork is offline VIP Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    6,073
    Teacher

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Susie Smith
    Quote Originally Posted by MikeNewYork
    Quote Originally Posted by Francois
    Usage rules. Out of mere curiosity, how does the 'more perfect' preamble run?

    FRC
    We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
    It seems you beat me to it. Beautiful, isn't it!!!!!
    :D
    It is beautiful. Politicians don't write that well these days. :wink:

  9. #29
    MrRightMan is offline Newbie
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1

    Default Re: What is 'purdy'?

    Quote Originally Posted by Francois View Post
    I don't think you can say 'very fascinating' (not gradable). Sorry to nitpick

    FRC
    Old thread but I couldn´t resist. New words and meanings are invented the whole time to languages. That´s how they evolve. This got me thinking because I do hear gradable fascinating a lot. Like that´s not so fascinating at all. Which to me makes perfect sense and feels good. Maybe because it has been accepted in general. You can lock yourself up with and stop evolving or go with the flow. That´s up to you. But by locking yourself like this stops the evolutionary process of linguistics. Not that you´re gonna read this old message :)

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0