#1  
Old 16-Jul-2004, 19:54
bmo bmo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 508
Default A request to those who

Is it "a request to those who" or "a request for those who?"

Thanks.

BMO
  #2  
Old 16-Jul-2004, 23:37
Editor, UsingEnglish.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 34,371
Home Country: UK
Native Language: British English
Current Location: Philippines
Member Type: English Teacher
Default

They are both possible. The first would be asking someone to do something and the second would be asking on behalf of someone.
  #3  
Old 16-Jul-2004, 23:47
bmo bmo is offline
Senior Member
Threadstarter  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 508
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tdol
They are both possible. The first would be asking someone to do something and the second would be asking on behalf of someone.
Got it, and thanks.

BMO
  #4  
Old 17-Jul-2004, 07:00
bmo bmo is offline
Senior Member
Threadstarter  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 508
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tdol
They are both possible. The first would be asking someone to do something and the second would be asking on behalf of someone.

From Internet:

1. I have a request, for those who are interested, to help me.
2. But I do have a request for those who have justified their use of cracked versions of my work: don't ask for support.
3. I have a request for those who read this site. I ask that everyone send positive thoughts toward my hard drive.

Is request for = request to?
  #5  
Old 17-Jul-2004, 09:19
Editor, UsingEnglish.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 34,371
Home Country: UK
Native Language: British English
Current Location: Philippines
Member Type: English Teacher
Default

One of the problems of posting late at night- I was thinking of a different verb. With 'have', we would probably use 'for'almost all the time.
  #6  
Old 17-Jul-2004, 16:24
bmo bmo is offline
Senior Member
Threadstarter  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 508
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tdol
One of the problems of posting late at night- I was thinking of a different verb. With 'have', we would probably use 'for'almost all the time.
Thanks, now it is absolutely clear.

BMO
  #7  
Old 17-Jul-2004, 20:25
Editor, UsingEnglish.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 34,371
Home Country: UK
Native Language: British English
Current Location: Philippines
Member Type: English Teacher
Default

I was thinking of 'make'.
  #8  
Old 18-Jul-2004, 16:13
bmo bmo is offline
Senior Member
Threadstarter  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 508
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tdol
I was thinking of 'make'.
Thanks. I was "arguing" with someone about "I have a request to those who" and "I have a request for those who" and now I know she is right all along, like you said, it is almost always FOR most of the time.

BMO
  #9  
Old 20-Jul-2004, 01:00
bmo bmo is offline
Senior Member
Threadstarter  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 508
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bmo
Quote:
Originally Posted by tdol
One of the problems of posting late at night- I was thinking of a different verb. With 'have', we would probably use 'for'almost all the time.
Thanks, now it is absolutely clear.

BMO
You were not wrong though; I did not say it was "Have" or "Make."

BMO
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
request, those


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Correct English-urgent request to correct sentences Anonymous Ask a Teacher 12 28-Nov-2006 18:25
Sorry for an URGENT request here! Please advise on PRONOUNS! Helped Wanted Ask a Teacher 2 23-Apr-2006 21:49
Edit my story-immediate request Anonymous Ask a Teacher 3 15-Mar-2004 16:05
Here is one last URGENT request! Much apologies for asking.. Helped Wanted Ask a Teacher 3 06-Oct-2003 01:30


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:08.



Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.