Forum newsfeeds
Forum Newsfeeds


Sites for Teachers

Sites for Teachers


Go Back   UsingEnglish.com ESL Forum > Learning English > Ask a Teacher

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 26-May-2003, 23:21
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default sufficient bite to be meaningful

Hi,

I don't quite understand the underlined sentences. Could anyone do me a favor?

In general , the Federal Communications Commission's efforts (to regulating fairness) met with little success throughout the 1950s, partly due to its inability to adequately police the requirements. A further contributory factor was the commission's internal confusion over how best to delimit a balance between advocacy on the part of the broadcaster, on the one hand, and the rights of those expressing opposing views, on the other. The net effect of the fairness requirements, then, was to encourage the makers of news programmes to avoid reports which were likely to attract the attention of the FCC even if, as was likely the case, its strictures would lack sufficient bite to be meaningful.

Thanks a lot.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 27-May-2003, 01:04
MikeNewYork's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Country: USA
Posts: 6,095
Current Location: New York
First Language: American English
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
MikeNewYork is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: sufficient bite to be meaningful

Quote:
Originally Posted by Celia
Hi,

I don't quite understand the underlined sentences. Could anyone do me a favor?

In general , the Federal Communications Commission's efforts (to regulating fairness) met with little success throughout the 1950s, partly due to its inability to adequately police the requirements. A further contributory factor was the commission's internal confusion over how best to delimit a balance between advocacy on the part of the broadcaster, on the one hand, and the rights of those expressing opposing views, on the other. The net effect of the fairness requirements, then, was to encourage the makers of news programmes to avoid reports which were likely to attract the attention of the FCC even if, as was likely the case, its strictures would lack sufficient bite to be meaningful.

Thanks a lot.
The first sentence states that the FCC was confused (unsure) about how to write rules that prohibited broadcasters from presenting only one side of an issue to the public.

The second sentence states that the media tried to comply with the rules even though the punishments were not very severe. It is likely that they wanted to avoid coming before the FCC for fear that the penalties would be increased.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
sufficient, bite, meaningful

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17.


vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2002 - 2008 UsingEnglish.com