-
too+adj+ to +?
The book is too hard to carry.
The book is too hard to be carried.
Which one is correct? If the first sentence is correct butt not the second one, why so?
Thanks! :o
-
Re: too+adj+ to +?

Originally Posted by
bread The book is too hard to carry.
The book is too hard to be carried.
Which one is correct? If the first sentence is correct butt not the second one, why so?
Thanks! :o
The phrase for us is often omitted,
The book is too heavy to carry.
The book is too heavy for us to carry.
The book is too heavy to be carried for us. (Not OK)
Note, hard describes a surface, whereas heavy describes weight.
All the best, :D
-
Re: too+adj+ to +?

Originally Posted by
Casiopea 
Originally Posted by
bread The book is too hard to carry.
The book is too hard to be carried.
Which one is correct? If the first sentence is correct butt not the second one, why so?
Thanks! :o
The phrase
for us is often omitted,
The book is too heavy to carry.
The book is too heavy
for us to carry.
The book is too heavy to be carried for us. (Not OK)
Note,
hard describes a surface, whereas
heavy describes weight.
All the best, :D
Can "hard" mean "very difficult?"
I meant the bk is very difficult too carry
-
In that sense, it would make sense to say 'the book is too hard to read'. I can't see it working with 'carry'.
-
The books are too heavy to be carried <= this sounds fine to me. No native speaker likes it?
FRC
-

Originally Posted by
Francois The books are too heavy to be carried <= this sounds fine to me. No native speaker likes it?
FRC
You're right; my comment, though, was on the semantic structure of the passive structure:
1. The books are too heavy (for us) to carry. (Active) :D
2. The books are too heavy to be carried for us. (Passive) :(
=> 'by us' would have been the correct form. :wink:
3. The books are too heavy to be carried by us. :D
Of course, 2 is grammatical given a situation wherein someone asks to carry our books: "The books are too heavy to be carried for us (i.e. You shouldn't carry them for us; they're too heavy).
In short, 1. refers to "us" as the carriers (the ones doing the action), not the carriees (the ones having the action done for them).
Is carriees even a word?
Hehe
All the best, FRC. :D
-
OK, sry for the misunderstanding.
FRC
-

Originally Posted by
Francois OK, sry for the misunderstanding.
FRC
No apologies necessary. :D Questions are good! 8)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules

Search Engine Optimization by
vBSEO 3.6.1