-

Originally Posted by
tdol OK- I'd added a 'can' to my mind's eye,
OK. So you mean the correct interpretation is " people can change...(and people can) make...and get to work", which is different from the answer of my book, right?
Well, that's possible, I think. But as I said to Cas, originally the sentence has this in front:
Americans believe that mature, sensible person sets goals for the future and works systematically toward them.
According to this sentence, I think for Americans it is not a matter of ability that they make appropriate plans and get to work.
Do you think your interpretation (people can change...(and people can) make...and get to work) is still contextualized?
----------
By the way, I don't understand this part of your comment (especially the underlined part):

Originally Posted by
tdol without which I have to interpretation completely.
-
I'm on a really bad typing day- 'change my interpretation'. ;-(
The sentence about Americans suggests it isn't an ability but a quality of a mature and sensible person.
-

Originally Posted by
tdol The sentence about Americans suggests it isn't an ability but a quality of a mature and sensible person.

Right. But you said:

Originally Posted by
tdol OK- I'd added a 'can' to my mind's eye
If you interpret the sentence as "...people can change... poeple can make appropriate plans, and people can get to work.", isn't it going to be about an ability, not a quality, of a mature person?
-
Yes, but that interprtation, wrong as it was, was made before I knew about the sentence about Americans. The use of 'can' would suggest ability or possibility in that way, rather than a quality.
-
So, how do you interpret the sentence now?
-
-
t~~~dol, I've been waiting for you here. :wink:
-
Oooops, sorry. Given that I misread the original, then I have to change to the other possibility.
-

Originally Posted by
tdol Oooops, sorry. Given that I misread the original, then I have to change to the other possibility.

Which means [(a): if they decide...make...and get to work] is correct?
-
In the absence of the phantom 'can', yes.
Similar Threads
-
By Francois in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 6
Last Post: 30-Jan-2007, 10:41
-
By Lenka in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 6
Last Post: 25-Sep-2004, 07:32
-
By welldone in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 41
Last Post: 03-Jul-2004, 19:32
-
By dduck in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 2
Last Post: 06-Sep-2003, 23:57
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules

Search Engine Optimization by
vBSEO 3.6.1