Is my understanding correct?

[sky753]

Hello Everyone,

I construe the follow sentence as :

He was trialed here on the priciple of the presumbion of innocence. However there was sufficient evidence proving that he was guilty.

The original sentence is:
"He is here because he was tried and convicted beyond reasonable doubt given the presumbtion of innocence by a jury of 12 people."

Regards

Sky

[androcles]

Your understanding is correct, but you made some mistakes:

Presumption instead presumbtion

Principle instead priciple

You can use the corrector built in your browser. Particularly I recommend Mozilla.

Regards

[susiedqq]

He went on trial here on the principle of presumption of innocence. However there was sufficient evidence proving that he was guilty.

[sky753]

Your understanding is correct, but you made some mistakes:

Presumption instead presumbtion

Principle instead priciple

You can use the corrector built in your browser. Particularly I recommend Mozilla.

Regards

Thanks a lot !!!

[sky753]

He went on trial here on the principle of presumption of innocence. However there was sufficient evidence proving that he was guilty.

Thanks. Your answer is more accurate!

[sky753]

Your understanding is correct, but you made some mistakes:

Presumption instead presumbtion

Principle instead priciple

You can use the corrector built in your browser. Particularly I recommend Mozilla.

Regards

By the way, what is the difference between try and convict?

[Anglika]

A person is tried by a court and convicted of a crime if the court's verdict is "guilty".

[sky753]

A person is tried by a court and convicted of a crime if the court's verdict is "guilty".

Thank you!