Forum newsfeeds
Forum Newsfeeds


Sites for Teachers

Sites for Teachers


Go Back   UsingEnglish.com ESL Forum > Learning English > Ask a Teacher

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-Sep-2004, 00:40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Country: Japan
Posts: 686
Current Location: Osaka
First Language: Japanese
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Taka
Default on the contrary??

The sentences:

Any grouping of human beings has its own world: a certain range of knowledge and certain modes of evaluation. Such a worldview is subject to constant modification as time rolls on, Nor can its association with the particular groupings prevent it from being adopted, to a greater or a lesser extent, by members of some other grouping. On the contrary, information, tastes, habits, modes of feeling and judgement can be transmitted from one sociocultural grouping to another, and individuals can in any case have loyalties to more than one grouping, so that they themselves are mobile between different worldviews accordingly.

Why "on the contrary"?? It's not contrary at all. In fact, it's almost the same thing, IMO; it seems to me that "information, tastes, habits, modes of feeling and judgement can be transmitted from one sociocultural grouping to another, and individuals can in any case have loyalties to more than one grouping..." is a paraphrase of "nor can its association with the particular groupings prevent it from being adopted...".
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-Sep-2004, 08:06
bigjohn
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You have found a wonderful example of terrible writing. I suspect this to be a poor translation from another language.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-Sep-2004, 09:12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Country: Japan
Posts: 686
Current Location: Osaka
First Language: Japanese
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Taka
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn
You have found a wonderful example of terrible writing. I suspect this to be a poor translation from another language.
So it's a translation, not written by a native speaker of English?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-Sep-2004, 14:53
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 727
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
twostep
Default Re: on the contrary??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taka
The sentences:

Any grouping of human beings has its own world: a certain range of knowledge and certain modes of evaluation. Such a worldview is subject to constant modification as time rolls on, Nor can its association with the particular groupings prevent it from being adopted, to a greater or a lesser extent, by members of some other grouping. On the contrary, information, tastes, habits, modes of feeling and judgement can be transmitted from one sociocultural grouping to another, and individuals can in any case have loyalties to more than one grouping, so that they themselves are mobile between different worldviews accordingly.

Why "on the contrary"?? It's not contrary at all. In fact, it's almost the same thing, IMO; it seems to me that "information, tastes, habits, modes of feeling and judgement can be transmitted from one sociocultural grouping to another, and individuals can in any case have loyalties to more than one grouping..." is a paraphrase of "nor can its association with the particular groupings prevent it from being adopted...".
Taka, this is the way I interpret it - things cannot be prevented from being shared just the opposite they will move to other groups.
May I inquire about the source of this paragraph?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-Sep-2004, 14:54
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 727
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
twostep
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn
You have found a wonderful example of terrible writing. I suspect this to be a poor translation from another language.
Please elaborate this statement. Thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-Sep-2004, 16:04
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Country: Japan
Posts: 686
Current Location: Osaka
First Language: Japanese
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Taka
Default Re: on the contrary??

Sorry, twostep, I don't understand what you mean (the underlined part in particular).

Quote:
Originally Posted by twostep
Taka, this is the way I interpret it - things cannot be prevented from being shared just the opposite they will move to other groups.

Quote:
Originally Posted by twostep
May I inquire about the source of this paragraph?
It's from an entrance exam of a Japanese university.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-Sep-2004, 16:13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 727
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
twostep
Default Re: on the contrary??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taka
Sorry, twostep, I don't understand what you mean (the underlined part in particular).

Quote:
Originally Posted by twostep
Taka, this is the way I interpret it - things cannot be prevented from being shared just the opposite they will move to other groups.

Quote:
Originally Posted by twostep
May I inquire about the source of this paragraph?
It's from an entrance exam of a Japanese university.
"on the contrary" or "just the opposite" - it cannot be prevented that information is being shared, moves on. It is like a secret. It will be shared no matter how to try to keep it from being shared with others. Can you prevent some flowers from spreading in your garden? On the contrary - they self seed. There is nothing you can do but pull up seedlings.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-Sep-2004, 16:43
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Country: Japan
Posts: 686
Current Location: Osaka
First Language: Japanese
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Taka
Default Re: on the contrary??

Quote:
Originally Posted by twostep
Taka, this is the way I interpret it - things cannot be prevented from being shared just the opposite they will move to other groups.

"on the contrary" or "just the opposite" - it cannot be prevented that information is being shared, moves on. It is like a secret. It will be shared no matter how to try to keep it from being shared with others. Can you prevent some flowers from spreading in your garden? On the contrary - they self seed. There is nothing you can do but pull up seedlings.
Now I see what you mean. The reason I didn't understand what you said is that you used "just the opposite" as a conjunction. Is such usage acceptable? If it is, I didn't know that.

Anyway, I think [you cannot prevent some flowers from spreading in your garden]=[they seed themselves]. In other words, both mean plants proliferate. I see no difference between them. If it were:

You cannot prevent some flowers from spreading in your garden. In fact, they seed themselves.

then I think it would make sense.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-Sep-2004, 17:09
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 727
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
twostep
Default Re: on the contrary??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taka
Quote:
Originally Posted by twostep
Taka, this is the way I interpret it - things cannot be prevented from being shared just the opposite they will move to other groups.

"on the contrary" or "just the opposite" - it cannot be prevented that information is being shared, moves on. It is like a secret. It will be shared no matter how to try to keep it from being shared with others. Can you prevent some flowers from spreading in your garden? On the contrary - they self seed. There is nothing you can do but pull up seedlings.
Now I see what you mean. The reason I didn't understand what you said is that you used "just the opposite" as a conjunction. Is such usage acceptable? If it is, I didn't know that.

I disagree Your Honor :wink:
You pack lunch for your child and tell him not to share it with friend A. In contrary - he shared it with friend A and friend B. In fact - he shared but on the contrary to your instructions. I think you have to bring that in. No matter what kings and chieftains or nature intended - ideas and progress countered instructions. Call it an act of disobedience. Is that how my cookies got spread around the whole class?

Anyway, I think [you cannot prevent some flowers from spreading in your garden]=[they seed themselves]. In other words, both mean plants proliferate. I see no difference between them. If it were:

You cannot prevent some flowers from spreading in your garden. In fact, they seed themselves.

then I think it would make sense.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-Sep-2004, 17:13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Country: Japan
Posts: 686
Current Location: Osaka
First Language: Japanese
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Taka
Default Re: on the contrary??

Ah! Now I got it

My Oxford Advanced Learner's only says:

on the contrary: used to introduce a statement that says the opposite of the last one.

And that was the only definition I knew, before I checked The American Heritage, which says:

on the contrary :In opposition to what has been stated or what is expected.

I've learned a lot now. :D

Thank you!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
contrary

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CONTRARY mountains Ask a Teacher 2 09-Jul-2004 11:49
Conditional Sentences Anonymous Ask a Teacher 3 02-Oct-2003 21:53


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:43.


vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2002 - 2008 UsingEnglish.com