#1  
Old 15-May-2008, 03:24
Key Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,129
Home Country: India
Native Language: Oriya
Current Location: India
Member Type: English Teacher
Exclamation Modal Verbs

Some schools of thought treat 'could' as a remote form of 'can' and not as as its past form. The remote form is explained in the following examples:
I couldn't do it. (remoteness of time)
It could happen. (remoteness of possibility)
Could you do me a favor? (remoteness of relationship)
How far this interpretation is correct? In the openion of this forum what is correct?
Another thing which puzzles me is ragarding use of 'should' and 'must'. Here are two sentences.
You must see a doctor.
You should see a doctor.
What is the difference? Are they interchangeable?
  #2  
Old 16-May-2008, 12:31
Soup's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,893
Home Country: Canada
Native Language: English
Current Location: China
Member Type: English Teacher
Default Re: Modal Verbs

Modality vs Tense
This isn't a new idea. The point is that modality is different from tense, that's all:
I couldn't do it.
(remoteness of time)

It could happen.
(remoteness of possibility)

Could you do me a favor?
(remoteness of relationship)
Modals
You must see a doctor.
=> It's required; strongly recommended.

You should see a doctor.
=> It's recommended.

Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
can, could, must, should


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
modal verbs san Ask a Teacher 1 01-Jan-2008 17:04
Modal verbs and Modal auxiliary verbs zoobinshid Ask a Teacher 2 26-Sep-2005 08:59
modal verbs Anonymous Ask a Teacher 1 22-Oct-2003 04:28


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:27.



Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.