I´ve got left/ has left to me?

[sambistapt]

Hello amigos!

Your love is all that I´ve got left.
Your love is all that has left to me.

Do the sentences above mean the same?

Thanks,

Sam

[Kraken]

I'm not a teacher, but I think the first one is OK, whereas I find the second one senseless.
In this second one I guess you were trying to say "Your love is all that's left" or "(...) is all that remains"

[tzfujimino]

Hello amigos!

Your love is all that I´ve got left.
Your love is all that has left to me.

Do the sentences above mean the same?

Thanks,

Sam

I think the second sentence should be....
Your love is all that has been left to me.

They both sound similar to me.
I'm not a native speaker of English, so please take it as my opinion.

[philadelphia]

At a guess, first works but take 'that' out and it should be better. Your love is all I have got left.

The second one sounds pretty awkward.

Not a teacher at all.

[riverkid]

Hello amigos!

Your love is all that I´ve got left.
Your love is all that has left to me.

Do the sentences above mean the same?

Thanks,

Sam

The second one, with 'has' is an odd collocation. It would work as,

Your love is all that's/that is left to me.

It sounds flowery/literary, like a the lyrics of a song or the words of a poem.

[jctgf]

please, how about "your love is all is left"?
thanks

[Anglika]

please, how about "your love is all is left"?
thanks

Absolutely no way.

"Your love is all that is left" is ok.

[riverkid]

please, how about "your love is all is left"?
thanks

Is it 'cause it's a subject relative pronoun, not an object relative pronoun?

Your love is all. It is left.

Your love is all [. It] that is left.

[puzzle]

Your love is all that I´ve got left.

Is it the right sentence without "left"? Please.

[riverkid]

Your love is all that I´ve got left.

Is it the right sentence without "left"? Please.

Yes, it's grammatical and sensible without 'left', Puzzle.