Forum newsfeeds
Forum Newsfeeds


Sites for Teachers

Sites for Teachers


Go Back   UsingEnglish.com ESL Forum > Learning English > Ask a Teacher

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 15-Jun-2008, 15:18
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dummy Pronouns (derogatory?)

A colleague of mine refers to people this way, "Anyone 'that' would like to attend..." rather than saying, "Anyone 'WHO' would like to attend...". I find this annoying, refering to people as inanimate objects. One would not say, "I found one seashell 'WHO' was different from all the rest." How can I explain this? What part of speech is this and why do we consider it wrong?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 15-Jun-2008, 16:23
Editor, UsingEnglish.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Country: UK
Posts: 25,261
Current Location: Phnom Penh
First Language: English
Thanks: 2
Thanked 325 Times in 296 Posts
Tdol has disabled reputation
Default Re: Dummy Pronouns (derogatory?)

It's a relative pronoun, though I see no problem with using 'that' for people. (British English speaker)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 15-Jun-2008, 16:25
Key Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,025
Current Location: Canada
First Language: English
Thanks: 4
Thanked 478 Times in 440 Posts
riverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Dummy Pronouns (derogatory?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
A colleague of mine refers to people this way, "Anyone 'that' would like to attend..." rather than saying, "Anyone 'WHO' would like to attend...". I find this annoying, refering to people as inanimate objects. One would not say, "I found one seashell 'WHO' was different from all the rest." How can I explain this? What part of speech is this and why do we consider it wrong?
Some consider it wrong but that doesn't make it wrong, Unreg.

That's John over there. And that's Melanie there.

While it can be argued that 'who' is more polite, it doesn't then follow that by using 'that', a speaker intends to be impolite.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to riverkid For This Useful Post:
tzfujimino (15-Jun-2008)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 15-Jun-2008, 22:14
RonBee's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Country: USA
Posts: 13,364
Current Location: North Carolina
First Language: English
Thanks: 73
Thanked 841 Times in 753 Posts
RonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Dummy Pronouns (derogatory?)

I second what the other posters have said. There is nothing wrong with using "that" to refer to a person. It's not derogatory, and it's not impolite. I'll let Google help me find a few uses of it.
Results 1 - 10 of about 237,000,000 for the man that.
the man that - Google Search

Results 1 - 10 of about 396,000 for "the man that".
"the man that" - Google Search

It's been used that way for a while. See:
http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/3251

and

The Man That Was Used Up - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

__________________
~R
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RonBee For This Useful Post:
tzfujimino (16-Jun-2008)
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 15-Jun-2008, 22:21
RonBee's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Country: USA
Posts: 13,364
Current Location: North Carolina
First Language: English
Thanks: 73
Thanked 841 Times in 753 Posts
RonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Dummy Pronouns (derogatory?)

Then there's Yahoo.
1 - 10 of 9,550,000 for "the man that"
"the man that" - Yahoo! Search Results=
One more example:
How do you shop for the man that has everything?
Implolite? I don't think so.


__________________
~R

Last edited by RonBee; 15-Jun-2008 at 22:48. Reason: punctuation
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RonBee For This Useful Post:
tzfujimino (16-Jun-2008)
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 15-Jun-2008, 22:25
Key Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,025
Current Location: Canada
First Language: English
Thanks: 4
Thanked 478 Times in 440 Posts
riverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Dummy Pronouns (derogatory?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RonBee View Post
I'll let Google help me find a few uses of it. [indent] Results 1 - 10 of about 237,000,000 for the man that.
the man that - Google Search

Results 1 - 10 of about 396,000 for "the man that".
"the man that" - Google Search
Just wonderin', Ron, how come the same search turned up two way different numbers.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 15-Jun-2008, 22:47
RonBee's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Country: USA
Posts: 13,364
Current Location: North Carolina
First Language: English
Thanks: 73
Thanked 841 Times in 753 Posts
RonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Dummy Pronouns (derogatory?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by riverkid View Post
Just wonderin', Ron, how come the same search turned up two way different numbers.
Putting "the man that" in quotes made a lot of difference. (Note that the Mark Twain story was written in the nineteenth century.)

__________________
~R
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RonBee For This Useful Post:
tzfujimino (16-Jun-2008)
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 15-Jun-2008, 22:55
Key Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,025
Current Location: Canada
First Language: English
Thanks: 4
Thanked 478 Times in 440 Posts
riverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Dummy Pronouns (derogatory?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RonBee View Post
Putting "the man that" in quotes made a lot of difference. (Note that the Mark Twain story was written in the nineteenth century.)

Oh, I see. Have you ever tried the Google "exact phrase" search option? It comes complete with a regional option, ie. the USA, the UK, Canada, etc.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to riverkid For This Useful Post:
tzfujimino (16-Jun-2008)
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 16-Jun-2008, 00:34
RonBee's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Country: USA
Posts: 13,364
Current Location: North Carolina
First Language: English
Thanks: 73
Thanked 841 Times in 753 Posts
RonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Dummy Pronouns (derogatory?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by riverkid View Post
Oh, I see. Have you ever tried the Google "exact phrase" search option? It comes complete with a regional option, ie. the USA, the UK, Canada, etc.
No, I don't think I know how to do that.
__________________
~R
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 16-Jun-2008, 01:23
Key Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,025
Current Location: Canada
First Language: English
Thanks: 4
Thanked 478 Times in 440 Posts
riverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Dummy Pronouns (derogatory?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RonBee View Post
No, I don't think I know how to do that.
Piece of cake, Ron.

1. Go to Google.com
2. Click on "Advanced Search"
3. Type what you want into the "this exact wording or phrase:" box.
4. Set your language.
5. Click on, "Date, usage rights, numeric range, and more" to set the region you want and hit ENTER.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to riverkid For This Useful Post:
tzfujimino (16-Jun-2008)
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
None

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
pronouns rezaa Ask a Teacher 2 18-Nov-2007 12:57
A Modest Proposal on Pronouns Englishman21stC General Language Discussions 3 08-Sep-2007 10:35
Object or subject pronouns? rggg1971 Ask a Teacher 1 20-Jun-2007 19:57
on relative pronouns ( in which) lisa*** Ask a Teacher 2 26-Jan-2006 04:00
referential pronouns vs. dummy pronouns inneedofhelp! Ask a Teacher 1 19-Mar-2005 02:29


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:03.


vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2002 - 2008 UsingEnglish.com