#1  
Old 26-Jun-2008, 21:51
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 461
Member Type: Student or Learner
Default why the use of simple past??!!

Hello all
I was reading a book and this sentence brought my attention. I was wandering why does the writer uses the simple past as the past continious seems the correct one for me. See if I'm wrong!!:
"I had never read anything as disturbing as these ten verses. I could not stop thinking about them day and night, when I ate, when I walked to and from work, when I sat alone, when I whatched tv, when I lay in bed......"
Why not was eating, was walking, was watching.....because it conveys a past continious action.
Clarify it for me please.
sara
  #2  
Old 26-Jun-2008, 21:56
bhaisahab's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 14,866
Home Country: England
Native Language: British English
Current Location: England
Member Type: English Teacher
Default Re: why the use of simple past??!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by sara88 View Post
Hello all
I was reading a book and this sentence brought my attention. I was wandering why does the writer uses the simple past as the past continious seems the correct one for me. See if I'm wrong!!:
"I had never read anything as disturbing as these ten verses. I could not stop thinking about them day and night, when I ate, when I walked to and from work, when I sat alone, when I whatched tv, when I lay in bed......"
Why not was eating, was walking, was watching.....because it conveys a past continious action.
Clarify it for me please.
sara
Personally, I agree with you, it would be better if it had stayed in the past simple, but authors write what they want to write.
  #3  
Old 26-Jun-2008, 23:02
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,425
Member Type: Other
Default

The author is saying, it doesn't matter whether you ask me after the first bite of my food, or any time during the period of time implied by 'was eating' - I'd be thinking about the scenes right until the last bite; and then I might walk...and still be thinking about them. The time period, the duration of any activity, is immaterial: I eat, I think about them. I walk, I think about them.

The style of writing is of a montage, snapshots, an instance of each of these activities to portray 'he's still thinking about them'. To use a continuous tense would destroy the dramatic effect of the prose - it's like a drum beat: I eat - boom - I think about them -boom - I walk - boom - I think about them.

Last edited by David L.; 26-Jun-2008 at 23:16.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is Yesterday a past time? shun General Language Discussions 10 13-Feb-2008 18:54
simple past - past perfect continuous interrogativedifferences Unregistered9996 Ask a Teacher 5 26-Dec-2007 03:05
A strange use of tense shun Linguistics 26 18-Sep-2006 02:45
Simple past versus past perfect or pluperfect chrisalor Ask a Teacher 2 05-Sep-2006 20:59
Simple Past - questionnaire for teachers Renatask Teaching English 2 27-Aug-2006 12:24


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:14.



Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.