|
#1
| |||
| |||
| The number of consenters, who stand for the last two points about the vehicles with low-tech parameters, are less than that of objectors. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Up! :D |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
What about? The number of people who consented is less than the number of people who objected. All the best, :D |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Hi Casiopea, who stand for the last two points about the ... = who agreed the last two points about the ... "The last two points": If there are five point(view)s, then "the last two points" refers to "the fourth point and the fifth point". Have you got "vehicles with low-tech parameters". The sentence "The number of people who consented is less than the number of people who objected" is okay. But what they consented? |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
I don't understand what they agreed to exactly. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Regarding "vehicles with low-tech parameters". Some machines are the products of high-tech, for example: a computer is a prodct of high-tech, so the computer has its high-tech parameters. Right? But a toy is just a low-tech product, so the toy has its low-tech parameters. Some vehicles are the products with low-tech parameters. Okay, now do you feel the original sentence is clear? ===>>>" The number of consenters, who stand for the last two points about the vehicles with low-tech parameters, are less than that of objectors. " |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
The number of people who consented/agreed to the last two points on (i.e., regarding) vehicles with low-tech parameters is less than the number of people who objected/disagreed. All the best, :D |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Good. But it seems a bit too long. |
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| clear, fine |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |