Forum newsfeeds
Forum Newsfeeds


Sites for Teachers

Sites for Teachers




Go Back   UsingEnglish.com ESL Forum > Learning English > Ask a Teacher

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-Oct-2004, 14:16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Country: Japan
Posts: 686
Current Location: Osaka
First Language: Japanese
Member Type: Other
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Taka
Default need comments

(1) Without a computer, a lot of people nowadays feel uneasy, irritated, which are symptoms of addiction.

(2) With their computer disconnected, a lot of people nowadays feel uneasy, irritated, which are symptoms of addiction.

(3 ) Without using a computer, a lot of people nowadays feel uneasy, irritated, which are symptoms of addiction.


(3) is the sentence written by a friend of mine, and he is asking me if it works or not. IMO, (3) is weird but I cannot explain well why; it just doesn't feel right.

Well, maybe I'm wrong and there is nothing wrong in the sentence (3) . If so, then that's fine.

Could anybody tell me if it works or not, and if not, then why?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-Oct-2004, 15:47
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,370
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Francois is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I don't like it either. "Without using a computer" looks like "I don't/didn't even need a computer".

FRC
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-Oct-2004, 20:41
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 727
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
twostep
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Francois
I don't like it either. "Without using a computer" looks like "I don't/didn't even need a computer".

FRC
How about "without access to a computer ..."?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-Oct-2004, 23:21
Editor, UsingEnglish.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Country: UK
Posts: 25,755
Current Location: Phnom Penh
First Language: English
Member Type: English Teacher
Thanks: 6
Thanked 590 Times in 516 Posts
Tdol has disabled reputation
Default

'Access' works, but the original sentence doesn't- I'd use 'access'or 1.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-Oct-2004, 02:52
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Country: Japan
Posts: 686
Current Location: Osaka
First Language: Japanese
Member Type: Other
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Taka
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tdol
'Access' works, but the original sentence doesn't- I'd use 'access'or 1.
tdol, could you tell me why "using" in "Without using a computer, a lot of people nowadays feel uneasy..." doesn't work? The same reason as Francois's?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-Oct-2004, 06:31
Casiopea's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,997
Current Location: China
First Language: English
Member Type: Other
Thanks: 0
Thanked 60 Times in 57 Posts
Casiopea will become famous soon enough
Default Re: need comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taka
(3) Without using a computer, a lot of people nowadays feel uneasy, irritated, which is are symptoms of addiction.
It's a dangling participle.

First, the modifying phrase 'Without using' expresses, Don't use/Try not to use. It's imperative; Its subject is (you):

Without (you) using a computer, type this document.
Type this document without (you) using a computer.
==>(You) Don't use a computer to type this document.
==>(You) Try not to use a computer to type this document.

Second, the subject of 'Without (you) using' and the subject of 'people feel uneasy' are not coreferential; they are not one and the same:

Without (you) using a computer, people feel uneasy. (Odd)
People feel uneasy without (you) using a computer. (Odd)
==> (You) Don't use a computer; people feel uneasy. (Odd)
==>(You) Try not to use a computer; people feel uneasy. (Odd)

In short, in A. the subjects agree, whereas in B. the subjects don't agree.

A. Without (you) using your hands, (you) pick up this pencil. :D
B. Without (you) using a computer, people feel uneasy. :(

Dangling Participle
When a modifier improperly modifies something, it is called a dangling participle.

Repair Strategy: Replace the participle with a non-participle nominal.

EX: Without the use of a computer, poeple feel uneasy.
EX: Without access to a computer, people feel uneasy.

All the best, :D
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-Oct-2004, 07:35
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Country: Japan
Posts: 686
Current Location: Osaka
First Language: Japanese
Member Type: Other
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Taka
Default Re: need comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casiopea
First, the modifying phrase 'Without using' expresses, Don't use/Try not to use. It's imperative; Its subject is (you):
I disagree.

(Examples)

Mike Craig uses Tween as a surfactant to allow the coating to penetrate. Without using it, he says that the coating is uneven.

http://www.apug.org/forums/archive/t-8738.html

He had a closed umbrella in his hand. He walked back through the rain without using it.

http://www.reppe.com/Dispatch_stories/VA_Pentagon.htm


The subjects of "using"s above are not (you).
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-Oct-2004, 09:25
Casiopea's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,997
Current Location: China
First Language: English
Member Type: Other
Thanks: 0
Thanked 60 Times in 57 Posts
Casiopea will become famous soon enough
Default Re: need comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taka
Mike Craig uses Tween as a surfactant to allow the coating to penetrate. Without using it, he says that the coating is uneven.

He had a closed umbrella in his hand. He walked back through the rain without using it.
Given that context, yes.

Without him using it, he says/he walked.... (OK; Coreferential)

Now try the original context:

1. Without them using it, people feel uneasy. (Not OK)
2. People feel uneasy without them using it. (Not OK)

The subjects in 1. and 2., respectively, are not coreferential.

Nonetheless you brought up a good point. Thank you. :D Let's try using the same verb category (i.e., stative verbs):

Without being able to use it, people feel uneasy. (OK)

Seems to me that the verbs as well as the subjects have to agree in kind.

All the best, :D
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-Oct-2004, 09:54
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,370
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Francois is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I don't agree with (or haven't understood) the imperative argument and the implicit 'you' either, but I don't think the "Mike Craig..." sentence is correct. The umbrella one is fine.

FRC
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-Oct-2004, 09:57
Casiopea's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,997
Current Location: China
First Language: English
Member Type: Other
Thanks: 0
Thanked 60 Times in 57 Posts
Casiopea will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Francois
I don't agree with (or haven't understood) the imperative argument and the implicit 'you' either, but I don't think the "Mike Craig..." sentence is correct. The umbrella one is fine.

FRC
Why do you feel the Mike Craig sentence is incorrect? It's just topicalized:

Quote:
Mike Craig uses Tween as a surfactant to allow the coating to penetrate. Without using it, he says that the coating is uneven.
He says that the coating is uneven without using it.

All the best, :D
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
comments

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Posting Comments in Blogs Red5 News and Announcements 0 03-Jul-2004 13:33
I hope you see it and give comments HardRock Ask a Teacher 6 18-Dec-2003 18:32
I would appreciate any comments on my first draft HardRock Ask a Teacher 1 19-Nov-2003 18:27


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:50.


vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2002 - 2008 UsingEnglish.com