Forum newsfeeds
Forum Newsfeeds


Sites for Teachers

Sites for Teachers




Go Back   UsingEnglish.com ESL Forum > Learning English > Ask a Teacher

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 25-Jul-2008, 01:23
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Country: Slovenia
Posts: 3
Current Location: Slovenia
First Language: Slovenian
Member Type: Student or Learner
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
srubys is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Some additional stuff about modals

hello



1)
a) I thought WILL could only have the form “WILL + present infinitive”! But in the following sentence WILL is used with perfect infinitive:

“I’m sure you will have noticed that attendance has fallen sharply.”

The main sentence does talk about present/future ( as in “You will notice now or soon” ), but why is PERFECT infinitive used instead of PRESENT infinitive?




2)
a) Past form of CAN is COULD and of WILL is WOULD. Are these verbs actual past forms ( the same way wrote is past form of write ), or does is just mean that when used to describe past, we use COULD/WOULD instead of CAN/WILL?

b)I know that COULD is a past form of CAN when talking about some ability in the past, but what do we use instead of CAN when we want to express a request, an offer or permission that someone gave in the past? Or can in at least some of those cases CAN be used as it is?

c)when COULD is used as a past form of CAN, its form can only be “COULD + present infinitive”, but not COULD + perfect infinitive? If so, why?



3) “He could have sold cars.”
“You could have told me.”

a) The above two sentences can only talk about something in the past and not the present/future?

Thus is the form “COULD + perfect infinitive” used only when talking about something that should be done, but it wasn’t?




4) Perfect present tense has same form as perfect infinitive and yet perfect infinitive is used to talk about actions that happened before another action. Shouldn’t prefect infinitive also be used to describe the same time period as present perfect tense?




5) Among other things we also use present participle for building present continuous and present perfect continuous tenses. Then why couldn’t we also claim that present gerund is used for building those two tenses?

thank you



cheers
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 25-Jul-2008, 12:49
Soup's Avatar
Key Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,844
Current Location: Shanghai, China
First Language: English
Member Type: English Teacher
Thanks: 28
Thanked 1,428 Times in 1,311 Posts
Soup has much to be proud ofSoup has much to be proud ofSoup has much to be proud ofSoup has much to be proud ofSoup has much to be proud ofSoup has much to be proud ofSoup has much to be proud ofSoup has much to be proud ofSoup has much to be proud ofSoup has much to be proud of
Default Re: Some additional stuff about modals

[1] Future perfect is also used to indicate a past likelihood, one that has consequences for the present or future:
  • "As you will have already heard, the gym will be closed today"
  • "You will have noticed that we no longer have a convertible."
The Future Tense (die Futur)
[2]
I can't come over tonight. <present>
I couldn't come over last night. <past>

Read more here.


[3] Click English Grammar Lessons


[4]
Use a present infinitive to express action at the same time as or later than that of the verb.
Use a perfect infinitive to express action earlier than that of the verb.
Ex: I prefer to stay right here.
(Present infinitive to stay.)

Ex: She would have liked to join you.
(Present infinitive to join.)

The perfect infinitive combines to have with the verb’s past participle: to have kicked, to have
written. It shows action that occurred earlier than that of the verb.

Ex: We now know human ancestors to have existed millions of years ago.
(Past infinitive to have existed.)

Ex: My father would like to have been an actor. (Perfect infinitive to have been.)

http://www.ohiodominican.edu/campus_.../VerbTense.pdf

See also Perfect Infinitive. Fowler, H. W. 1908. The King's English

[5] "... why couldn't we also claim that present gerund is used for building those two tenses?"
=>Becuase a gerund cannot function as a part of a verb. Gerunds are either subjects or objects.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
stuff, in cricket lalda222 Ask a Teacher 1 06-Jan-2008 23:34
Modals --> Double Modals Unregistered Ask a Teacher 1 05-Nov-2007 01:40
Stuff jack Ask a Teacher 2 29-Nov-2004 21:22
Stuff jack Ask a Teacher 3 26-Oct-2004 08:56


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:53.


vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2002 - 2008 UsingEnglish.com