|
#1
| |||
| |||
| 1. The casino is a license to print money. 2. The casino is a licensed to print money. |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
3. The casino is licensed to print money. :D (Passive) |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Or 'the casino has a license to print money'. By the way, where is this place, Jack? |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
What's a casino? It's a license to print money. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
Are these correct? Which one do I use? 1. It is in the movie, I think I was watching Walking Tall. 2. It was in the movie, I think I was watching Walking Tall. (This doesn't make sense right? Because 'was' is here and that means it is not in the movie anymore? Quote:
4. This casino is a license to print money. (How do you know if this is not an adjective?) |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| [quote="jack"] Are these correct? Which one do I use? 1. It is in the movie, I think I was watching Walking Tall. (OK) 2. It was in the movie, I think I was watching Walking Tall. (OK) Senetence 1. refers to a general truth, whereas sentence 2. refers to the past--the time you were watching the movie. Quote:
Quote:
EX: a licenced establishment (Determiner+Adjective+Noun) If it's preceded by a determiner and not followed by a noun, then it's a noun: EX: a license to print money (Determiner+Noun+Infintive Phrase) |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| If it's preceded by a determiner and not followed by a noun, then it's a noun: EX: a license to print money (Determiner+Noun+Infintive Phrase) What do you mean by it's not followed by a noun? If it's preceded by a determiner (a/the) and followed by a noun, then it's an adjective: EX: a licenced establishment (Determiner+Adjective+Noun) What do you mean by it's followed by a noun? I see it is followed by an adjective. Are these correct? If not, why? 1. Her beauty is beyond compare. 2. Her beauty is beyond compared. (Why is this wrong? This is not a to-be sentence? What do these mean? 3. Imported cars. 4. Import cars. 5. Imported models. 6. Import models. |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| Hi Jack, Let me just give Casiopea a little break here. The capitalized comments below are not shouting; I am just distinguishing my words from yours and Casiopea's: 'If it's preceded by a determiner and not followed by a noun, then it's a noun: EX: a license to print money (Determiner+Noun+Infintive Phrase)' 'What do you mean by it's not followed by a noun?' 'LICENSE' HAS A DETERMINER BEFORE IT, BUT 'LICENSE' DOES NOT HAVE A NOUN AFTER IT-- THEREFORE IT IS A NOUN. 'If it's preceded by a determiner (a/the) and followed by a noun, then it's an adjective: EX: a licenced establishment (Determiner+Adjective+Noun)' 'What do you mean by it's followed by a noun? I see it is followed by an adjective? 'LICENSED' ALSO HAS A DETERMINER BEFORE IT, BUT 'LICENSED' HAS A NOUN, 'ESTABLISHMENT', AFTER IT-- THEREFORE IT IS AN ADJECTIVE.' Are these correct? If not, why? 1. Her beauty is beyond compare. 2. Her beauty is beyond compared. (Why is this wrong? This is not a to-be sentence? (1) IS CORRECT. 'COMPARE' IS A NOUN, THE OBJECT OF THE PREPOSITION 'BEYOND'. THE PHRASE IS A NOUN COMPLEMENT OF THE SUBJECT, 'HER BEAUTY. 'BE' IS A COPULATIVE VERB. (2) IS INCORRECT. ADJECTIVES CANNOT BE OBJECTS OF PREPOSITIONS. (3) through (6) 'IMPORT' IS A VERB WHICH HAS BECOME AN ADJECTIVE (PROBABLY VIA THE PHRASE 'IMPORT BUSINESS'); IT HAS THE SAME MEANING HERE AS 'IMPORTED'. HOPE THIS HELPS. |
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
| First, here's a trick you can use to help you decide if the word that comes after 'a' or 'the' is an adjective or a noun: Delete the word that comes after 'a' or 'the', like this, A. It's a license to make money => It's a to make money. (Not OK) B. It's a licenced restaurant => It's a restaurant. (OK) If the sentence sounds OK after you've deleted the word, then the word is an adjective (B.). If the sentence doesn't sound OK, then the word is a noun (A.). Nouns are required. Adjectives are not required. Adjectives function as added information, so if you delete them, the sentence will be OK. Second, as a rule, a preposition takes a noun as its object. Sentence 2. is not OK because 'beyond' is a preposition and 'compared' is an adjective. Notice the -ed ending on 'compared'. It is not a noun. :wink: 1. Her beauty is beyond compare. (Preposition + Noun) 2. Her beauty is beyond compared. (Preposition + Adjective) Lastly, 'imported' is an adjective and the -ed ending means, have been imported, whereas 'import', without the -ed, is a noun--it's short for the noun 'importation'--and it functions as an adjective in 4. and 6. 3. imported cars :D Cars that have been imported 4. import cars 5. imported models :D Models that have been imported 6. import models 7. It's an import. (It's an importation) 8. It's an import car. (It's an importation car) |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Thank you very much for the detail information guys. What do these mean? Which one do I use? 1. Thank you very much for the detail information guys. 2. Thank you very much for the detailed information guys. Quote:
3. Her beauty is beyond compared. But you can say this: 4. This car is compared to this car and this car is better. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| adding |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Adding -s | jack | Ask a Teacher | 27 | 05-Jan-2005 14:25 |
| adding ed | jack | Ask a Teacher | 117 | 13-Dec-2004 10:21 |
| adding -s | jack | Ask a Teacher | 56 | 10-Nov-2004 10:48 |
| adding -ing | jack | Ask a Teacher | 5 | 26-Oct-2004 11:06 |
| Adding -ed and -s | jack | Ask a Teacher | 1 | 16-Sep-2004 13:55 |