Forum newsfeeds
Forum Newsfeeds


Sites for Teachers

Sites for Teachers




Go Back   UsingEnglish.com ESL Forum > Learning English > Ask a Teacher

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-Sep-2008, 01:00
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Country: ROC
Posts: 231
Current Location: Taiwan
First Language: Hokkien and Mandarin Chinese
Member Type: English Teacher
Thanks: 359
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
sitifan is on a distinguished road
Default to not V

look through somebody/something (phrasal verb)
to not notice or pretend not to notice someone you know, even though you see them
http://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/look_1
look through sb
to not notice someone that you know, or to pretend that you have not noticed someone, even though you are looking directly at them
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=look.through*2+0&dict=P

Why use "to not V"? Why not use "not to V"?
What's the difference in meaning or style between the above two structures?
_________________
Thank you very much for your reply.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-Sep-2008, 03:04
Raymott's Avatar
Key Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Country: Australia
Posts: 3,187
Current Location: Brisbane
First Language: English
Member Type: Academic
Thanks: 46
Thanked 1,388 Times in 1,279 Posts
Raymott has much to be proud ofRaymott has much to be proud ofRaymott has much to be proud ofRaymott has much to be proud ofRaymott has much to be proud ofRaymott has much to be proud ofRaymott has much to be proud ofRaymott has much to be proud ofRaymott has much to be proud ofRaymott has much to be proud of
Default Re: to not V

Quote:
Originally Posted by sitifan View Post
look through somebody/something (phrasal verb)
to not notice or pretend not to notice someone you know, even though you see them
http://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/look_1
look through sb
to not notice someone that you know, or to pretend that you have not noticed someone, even though you are looking directly at them
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=look.through*2+0&dict=P

Why use "to not V"? Why not use "not to V"?
What's the difference in meaning or style between the above two structures?
_________________
Thank you very much for your reply.
All the other definitions for verbs begin with "to ... ". Why do you want them to change their style for negative meanings? Usually there's no difference between "to not do something" and "not to do something".
In this case they're just being consistent.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Raymott For This Useful Post:
sitifan (03-Sep-2008)
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:53.


vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2002 - 2008 UsingEnglish.com