Dear Sir,
The parts highlighted in Brown in paragraph ( B ) and ( C ) are
grammatically correct.
How about the parts highlighted in Brown in paragraph ( A ) and ( D ), are they also grammatically correct?
Is "
to" means "
according to" In paragraph ( A ) and ( D ). If so, can
said be placed at the end of the phrase?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/15/business/15lehman.html?pagewanted=2&hp
(
The New York Times, Business)
( A ): A leading proposal to rescue Lehman would have divided the bank into two entities, a “good bank” and a “bad bank.” Under that scenario, Barclays would have bought the parts of Lehman that have been performing well, while a group of 10 to 15
Wall Street companies would have agreed to absorb losses from the bank’s troubled assets,
to two people briefed on the proposal said. Taxpayer money would not have been included in such a deal, they said.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20080915/news_1n15lehman.html
(The
San Diego Union Tribune)
( B ): A leading proposal to rescue Lehman would have divided the bank into two entities, a “good bank” and a “bad bank.” Under that scenario, Barclays would have bought the parts of Lehman that have been performing well, while a group of 10 to 15 Wall Street companies would have agreed to absorb losses from the bank's troubled assets,
two people briefed on the proposal said. Taxpayer money would not have been included in such a deal, they said.
http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20080915/ARTICLE/809150370/-1/FRONTPAGE&title=End_is_near_for_storied_Lehman
(HeraldTribune.com)
( C ): The leading proposal to rescue Lehman had been to divide the bank into two entities, a "good bank" and a "bad bank." Under that last scenario, Barclays would have bought the parts of Lehman that have been performing well, while a group of 10 to 15 Wall Street companies would agree to absorb losses from the bank's troubled assets,
according to two people briefed on the proposal. Taxpayer money would not be included in such a deal, they said.
http://www.timesdaily.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080915/ZNYT01/809150345&title=After_Frantic_Day__Wall_St__Banks_ Falter&template=printpicart
(TimesDaily.com)
( D ): A leading proposal to rescue Lehman would have divided the bank into two entities, a “good bank” and a “bad bank.” Under that scenario, Barclays would have bought the parts of Lehman that have been performing well, while a group of 10 to 15 Wall Street companies would have agreed to absorb losses from the bank’s troubled assets,
to two people briefed on the proposal said. Taxpayer money would not have been included in such a deal, they said.
Your advice will be very much appreciated!