Forum newsfeeds
Forum Newsfeeds


Sites for Teachers

Sites for Teachers


Go Back   UsingEnglish.com ESL Forum > Learning English > Ask a Teacher

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-Jul-2003, 15:38
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Negative present tens without auxiliary

When William Faulkner accept his award as a Nobel prize winner in Stockholm he said, among other things: "...He or she (the young man o woman writing today) writes not of love but of lust, of defeats in which nobody loses anything of value, of victories without hope and, worst of all, without pity or compassion...He writes not of the heart bu of the glands". I need to know when it is correct to use the negative present tens without the auxiliary do :?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-Jul-2003, 16:44
RonBee's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Country: USA
Posts: 13,536
Current Location: North Carolina
First Language: English
Member Type: Other
Thanks: 73
Thanked 901 Times in 806 Posts
RonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Negative present tens without auxiliary

We use the negative to deny something, though by denying that thing we also call attention to it. I don't think there is such a thing as a negative tense.

http://www.usingenglish.com/glossary/negative.html

8)
__________________
~R
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-Jul-2003, 16:50
Lib Lib is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Country: Ireland
Posts: 103
Current Location: Spain
First Language: English
Member Type: English Teacher
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lib
Default Re: Negative present tens without auxiliary

A_chacon,
I would advise you not to use the negative form in the way Faulkner did. It's correct, but quite 'poetic' and wouldn't really be used in every day speech. It's probably better (at least easier and just as correct) to stick to the ordinary negative form: He doesn't write of ....
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-Jul-2003, 16:56
RonBee's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Country: USA
Posts: 13,536
Current Location: North Carolina
First Language: English
Member Type: Other
Thanks: 73
Thanked 901 Times in 806 Posts
RonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Negative present tens without auxiliary

I don't know if this will help, but this is a sentence I recently used in correspondence.

Quote:
"You probably knew that, but I'm a perfectionist, and I feel the need to correct my error if not apologize for it."
Here's another:

Quote:
I don't use ain't often, but I use it more often than aren't I. The one I only use occasionally. The other I use not at all.
8)
__________________
~R
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-Jul-2003, 17:25
RonBee's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Country: USA
Posts: 13,536
Current Location: North Carolina
First Language: English
Member Type: Other
Thanks: 73
Thanked 901 Times in 806 Posts
RonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Negative present tens without auxiliary

Often, the use of the negative with the auxiliary "do" is the more common one.

A. I do not agree at all.
B. I agree not at all.

However, in some common expressions "do" isn't used at all.

"That's not what I said."

The previous sentence is the same as "I did not say that", but it is, perhaps, more emphatic.

8)
__________________
~R
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-Jul-2003, 17:35
RonBee's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Country: USA
Posts: 13,536
Current Location: North Carolina
First Language: English
Member Type: Other
Thanks: 73
Thanked 901 Times in 806 Posts
RonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Negative present tens without auxiliary

The phrase "do not" is used to make a negative statement out of what otherwise would be a positive one.

I do not want to talk to him.
I do not want you to play with X.
I do not want you to speak to him.
I do not want to do that.
I do not want you to do that.
I do not want that to happen.
I do not want to go there.
I do not want you to go there.
I do not want you to talk to that man.
I do not want you to play in the street.
I do not want you to eat that.
I do not like that.
I do not like him.
I do not like broccoli.
I do not agree with that.
I do not wish to be told what to do.

8)
__________________
~R
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-Jul-2003, 17:51
RonBee's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Country: USA
Posts: 13,536
Current Location: North Carolina
First Language: English
Member Type: Other
Thanks: 73
Thanked 901 Times in 806 Posts
RonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Negative present tens without auxiliary

Faulkner uses the negative (not and no) very well in his speech.

Quote:
I feel that this award was not made to me as a man, but to my work--a life's work in the agony and sweat of the human spirit, not for glory and least of all for profit, but to create out of the materials of the human spirit something which did not exist before.

...

It will not be difficult to find a dedication for the money part of it commensurate with the purpose and significance of its origin. But I would like to do the same with the acclaim too, by using this moment as a pinnacle from which I might be listened to by the young men and women already dedicated to the same anguish and travail, among whom is already that one who will some day stand where I am standing.

...

He must teach himself that the basest of all things is to be afraid: and, teaching himself that, forget it forever, leaving no room in his workshop for anything but the old verities and truths of the heart, the universal truths lacking which any story is ephemeral and doomed--love and honor and pity and pride and compassion and sacrifice. Until he does so, he labors under a curse. He writes not of love but of lust, of defeats in which nobody loses anything of value, and victories without hope and worst of all, without pity or compassion. His griefs grieve on no universal bones, leaving no scars. He writes not of the heart but of the glands.

...

I believe that man will not merely endure: he will prevail. He is immortal, not because he alone among creatures has an inexhaustible voice, but because he has a soul, a spirit capable of compassion and sacrifice and endurance. The poet's, the writer's, duty is to write about these things.

...

The poet's voice need not merely be the record of man, it can be one of the props, the pillars to help him endure and prevail.

http://www.rjgeib.com/thoughts/faulkner/faulkner.html
__________________
~R
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-Jul-2003, 18:48
RonBee's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Country: USA
Posts: 13,536
Current Location: North Carolina
First Language: English
Member Type: Other
Thanks: 73
Thanked 901 Times in 806 Posts
RonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to beholdRonBee is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Negative present tens without auxiliary

Litotes
http://www.usingenglish.com/glossary/litotes.html

8)
__________________
~R
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-Jul-2003, 21:03
Editor, UsingEnglish.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Country: UK
Posts: 25,454
Current Location: Phnom Penh
First Language: English
Member Type: English Teacher
Thanks: 6
Thanked 429 Times in 385 Posts
Tdol has disabled reputation
Default

It's a bit of an archaic form that people use when getting oratorical.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
negative, present, tens, without, auxiliary

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
simple present and present continuous Anonymous Frequently Asked Questions 7 31-Jul-2005 13:32
Negative / Auxiliary verbs Anonymous Ask a Teacher 1 27-Jan-2004 07:05
The Hidden Evidence: The Past Family shun Teaching English 145 08-Nov-2003 23:56


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:59.


vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2002 - 2008 UsingEnglish.com