Forum newsfeeds 
|  | | Notices | You are welcome to answer questions posted in the Ask a Teacher forum as long as your suggestions, help, and advice reflect a good understanding of the English language. If you are not a teacher, you will need to state that clearly at the top of your post. Please note, all posts are moderated by our in-house language experts, so make sure your suggestions, help, and advice house the kind of information an international language teacher would offer. If not, and your posts do not contribute to the topic in a positive way, they will be subject to deletion. | 
10-Jul-2003, 06:26
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: May 2003 Country: Moscow
Posts: 66
First Language: russian Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| |  At/in, so/as & well/good
Hello, dear teachers
I’d like to know how to say correctly:
1.I’m not so well at English as you are.
2.I’m not so good at English as you are.
3.I’m not so well in English as you are.
4.I’m not so good in English as you are.
5.I’m not as well at English as you are.
I’d rather prefer the first one :wink:
Thanks in advance! |
10-Jul-2003, 06:50
| | Member | | Join Date: May 2003 Country: Ireland
Posts: 103
Current Location: Spain First Language: English Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Re: At/in, so/as & well/good
You can be 'good at', 'bad at', 'great at' doing things, so the preposition is 'at'.
After the verb 'to be', we don't usually use adverbs, so you must use 'good'.
Because the sentence is negative, you can use either 'as' or 'so'. I prefer 'as', but that doesn't mean it's better. According to grammar rules I've read, 'so' can go in negatives of this kind and 'as' can go in either negative or positive sentences.
I would say: I'm not as good at English as you (are).
It would also be correct to say: I'm not so good at English as you (are).
What do the rest of you think? |
10-Jul-2003, 07:07
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: May 2003 Country: Moscow
Posts: 66
First Language: russian Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Re: At/in, so/as & well/good
Thank you very much, Lib. It's a very clear explanation. Now I see my mistake. I always have a lot of difficulties with the things mentioned in the subject line, especially with prepositions. |
10-Jul-2003, 13:58
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: May 2003 Country: Taif
Posts: 66
Current Location: usa First Language: Arabic Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Re: At/in, so/as & well/good
Quote: |
4.I’m not so good in English as you are.
| I prefer this one. :wink: |
10-Jul-2003, 15:54
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Feb 2003 Country: USA
Posts: 13,364
Current Location: North Carolina First Language: English Thanks: 73
Thanked 841 Times in 753 Posts
| | Re: At/in, so/as & well/good
I would say, "I'm not as good at English as you are."
BTW, I agree with Lib's analysis.
:)
__________________
~R |
10-Jul-2003, 20:57
| | Editor, UsingEnglish.com | | Join Date: Nov 2002 Country: UK
Posts: 25,261
Current Location: Phnom Penh First Language: English Thanks: 2
Thanked 325 Times in 296 Posts
| |
While 'so' is fine, I would naturally use 'as' whether positive or negative. 'So' is correct, but I think it's making its way out of use.  |
10-Jul-2003, 22:05
| | Member | | Join Date: May 2003 Country: Ireland
Posts: 103
Current Location: Spain First Language: English Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Re: At/in, so/as & well/good
Yes Tdol, I agree that 'so' is disappearing, but it hasn't gone yet. However, being good 'in' something sounds weird to me ... it sounds Spanglish, or at least interfered with by some other language. You live in England (I think), so ask other 'real' speakers if they'd say it. If it's no trouble of course... thanks. |
10-Jul-2003, 23:09
| | Moderator | | Join Date: Feb 2003 Country: USA
Posts: 13,364
Current Location: North Carolina First Language: English Thanks: 73
Thanked 841 Times in 753 Posts
| | Re: At/in, so/as & well/good
I did a Web search for the phrases in question and came up with some interesting results.
"good at English" = 7,800
"good in English" = 6,680
I doubt that many native speakers say "good in English", but apparently many ESL speakers do.
It's understandable if ESL learners learn that "proficient in English" is acceptable that they think "good in English" is too. It's a natural assumption. My guess is that is it likely to become even more common--at least among ESL learners. "good in English" http://thestar.com.my/lifestyle/stor...atures/moe2610
__________________
~R |
11-Jul-2003, 22:03
| | Editor, UsingEnglish.com | | Join Date: Nov 2002 Country: UK
Posts: 25,261
Current Location: Phnom Penh First Language: English Thanks: 2
Thanked 325 Times in 296 Posts
| | Re: At/in, so/as & well/good
Quote: |
Originally Posted by Lib Yes Tdol, I agree that 'so' is disappearing, but it hasn't gone yet. However, being good 'in' something sounds weird to me ... it sounds Spanglish, or at least interfered with by some other language. You live in England (I think), so ask other 'real' speakers if they'd say it. If it's no trouble of course... thanks. | Just about everybody I know does not use 'so'. |
12-Jul-2003, 06:35
| | Member | | Join Date: May 2003 Country: Ireland
Posts: 103
Current Location: Spain First Language: English Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Re: At/in, so/as & well/good
Yes, I agree Tdol. I got confused, I thought it was you who had said that you prefer 'I'm not so good in English'. It was, in fact, ESL-lover.
[/quote] | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | | 
Similar Threads | | Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | | at/in the moment | blacknomi | Ask a Teacher | 20 | 06-Jun-2004 20:14 | All times are GMT. The time now is 04:20. | |
