-
At/in, so/as & well/good
Hello, dear teachers
I’d like to know how to say correctly:
1.I’m not so well at English as you are.
2.I’m not so good at English as you are.
3.I’m not so well in English as you are.
4.I’m not so good in English as you are.
5.I’m not as well at English as you are.
I’d rather prefer the first one :wink:
Thanks in advance!
-
Re: At/in, so/as & well/good
You can be 'good at', 'bad at', 'great at' doing things, so the preposition is 'at'.
After the verb 'to be', we don't usually use adverbs, so you must use 'good'.
Because the sentence is negative, you can use either 'as' or 'so'. I prefer 'as', but that doesn't mean it's better. According to grammar rules I've read, 'so' can go in negatives of this kind and 'as' can go in either negative or positive sentences.
I would say: I'm not as good at English as you (are).
It would also be correct to say: I'm not so good at English as you (are).
What do the rest of you think?
-
Re: At/in, so/as & well/good
Thank you very much, Lib. It's a very clear explanation. Now I see my mistake. I always have a lot of difficulties with the things mentioned in the subject line, especially with prepositions.
-
Re: At/in, so/as & well/good
4.I’m not so good in English as you are.
I prefer this one. :wink:
-
Re: At/in, so/as & well/good
I would say, "I'm not as good at English as you are."
BTW, I agree with Lib's analysis.
:)
-
While 'so' is fine, I would naturally use 'as' whether positive or negative. 'So' is correct, but I think it's making its way out of use.
-
Re: At/in, so/as & well/good
Yes Tdol, I agree that 'so' is disappearing, but it hasn't gone yet. However, being good 'in' something sounds weird to me ... it sounds Spanglish, or at least interfered with by some other language. You live in England (I think), so ask other 'real' speakers if they'd say it. If it's no trouble of course... thanks.
-
Re: At/in, so/as & well/good
I did a Web search for the phrases in question and came up with some interesting results.
"good at English" = 7,800
"good in English" = 6,680
I doubt that many native speakers say "good in English", but apparently many ESL speakers do.
It's understandable if ESL learners learn that "proficient in English" is acceptable that they think "good in English" is too. It's a natural assumption. My guess is that is it likely to become even more common--at least among ESL learners.
"good in English"
http://thestar.com.my/lifestyle/stor...atures/moe2610
-
Re: At/in, so/as & well/good

Originally Posted by
Lib Yes Tdol, I agree that 'so' is disappearing, but it hasn't gone yet. However, being good 'in' something sounds weird to me ... it sounds Spanglish, or at least interfered with by some other language. You live in England (I think), so ask other 'real' speakers if they'd say it. If it's no trouble of course... thanks.
Just about everybody I know does not use 'so'.
-
Re: At/in, so/as & well/good
Yes, I agree Tdol. I got confused, I thought it was you who had said that you prefer 'I'm not so good in English'. It was, in fact, ESL-lover.
[/quote]
Similar Threads
-
By blacknomi in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 20
Last Post: 06-Jun-2004, 21:14
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules

Search Engine Optimization by
vBSEO 3.6.1