#1  
Old 09-Nov-2004, 13:28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 841
Home Country: Japan
Native Language: Japanese
Current Location: Japan
Member Type: Other
Default Question

The sentences:

The dog and the cat. Two things they have in common, namely, that both belong to the order of carnivores and both serve man in their captivity of hunters.
-----
My book interprets " both serve man in their captivity of hunters" as "both animals work as hunters and help man to capture other animals". Is this correct? Does the word "hunters" refer to the dog and the cat??

I thought "hunters" referred to "man", and "in their captivity of hunters" meant "confined by man"...
  #2  
Old 10-Nov-2004, 11:16
Casiopea's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,971
Member Type: Other
Default Re: Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taka
The sentences:

The dog and the cat. Two things they have in common, namely, that both belong to the order of carnivores and both serve man in their captivity of hunters.
-----
My book interprets " both serve man in their captivity of hunters" as "both animals work as hunters and help man to capture other animals". Is this correct? Does the word "hunters" refer to the dog and the cat??

I thought "hunters" referred to "man", and "in their captivity of hunters" meant "confined by man"...
their captivity of hunters is an odd phrase, notably 'captivity of'. I can't help but wonder if it's supposed to read, capacity as hunters:

, and both in their capacity as hunters serve man.

By the way, lions are hunters. An animal that hunts for food is a called hunter.
  #3  
Old 30-Nov-2004, 16:37
MikeNewYork's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,073
Member Type: Academic
Default Re: Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taka
The sentences:

The dog and the cat. Two things they have in common, namely, that both belong to the order of carnivores and both serve man in their captivity of hunters.
-----
My book interprets " both serve man in their captivity of hunters" as "both animals work as hunters and help man to capture other animals". Is this correct? Does the word "hunters" refer to the dog and the cat??

I thought "hunters" referred to "man", and "in their captivity of hunters" meant "confined by man"...
Hi Taka. Sorry I missed your message.

I agree with Cas on this one. The sentence only makes sense to me if "captivity" is replaced with "capacity".
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
question


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tag question Anonymous Ask a Teacher 1 17-Jun-2004 10:11
Ambiguous Question Interpretation Anonymous Ask a Teacher 7 23-Apr-2004 23:47
question Anonymous Ask a Teacher 2 24-Feb-2004 13:56
Grammatical question Anonymous Ask a Teacher 2 15-Oct-2003 22:47
a question I saw form other website.. kain Ask a Teacher 2 10-Oct-2003 22:05


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:14.



Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.